Univariate analysis
| Variable . | P, log-rank, 2-tailed . |
|---|---|
| Univariate analysis of primary cutaneous T-cell lymphomas | |
| T-cell type (αβ versus γδ) | < .0001 |
| Histologic profile, epidermotropic or dermal versus subcutaneous | < .0001 |
| Age, among 4 groups | .93 |
| Sex | .047 |
| Adenopathy, normal versus positive | .66 |
| Bone marrow, normal versus positive | .05 |
| Univariate analysis of cutaneous γδ T-cell lymphomas | |
| Histologic profile, epidermotropic or dermal versus subcutaneous | .067 |
| Age, among 4 groups | .14 |
| Sex | .77 |
| Adenopathy, normal versus positive | .17 |
| Hemophagocytic syndrome, negative versus positive | .21 |
| Variable . | P, log-rank, 2-tailed . |
|---|---|
| Univariate analysis of primary cutaneous T-cell lymphomas | |
| T-cell type (αβ versus γδ) | < .0001 |
| Histologic profile, epidermotropic or dermal versus subcutaneous | < .0001 |
| Age, among 4 groups | .93 |
| Sex | .047 |
| Adenopathy, normal versus positive | .66 |
| Bone marrow, normal versus positive | .05 |
| Univariate analysis of cutaneous γδ T-cell lymphomas | |
| Histologic profile, epidermotropic or dermal versus subcutaneous | .067 |
| Age, among 4 groups | .14 |
| Sex | .77 |
| Adenopathy, normal versus positive | .17 |
| Hemophagocytic syndrome, negative versus positive | .21 |