Incidence of cGvHD in period 1993-1996
Risk factor . | cGvHD, row % . | ||
---|---|---|---|
No . | Limited . | Extensive . | |
All patients | 52 | 25 | 23 |
Sex3-150,3-151 | |||
Male | 48 | 25 | 27 |
Female | 58 | 24 | 18 |
Age, y3-150,3-151 | |||
Younger than 20 | 68 | 21 | 11 |
20-40 | 51 | 25 | 24 |
Older than 40 | 50 | 25 | 25 |
Donor-recipient sex combination3-150,3-151 | |||
Donor (F) + recipient (M) | 41 | 26 | 33 |
Other | 56 | 24 | 20 |
Interval between diagnosis and transplantation | |||
Shorter than 12 mo | 52 | 23 | 25 |
12 mo or longer | 52 | 26 | 22 |
aGvHD prevention3-150,3-151 | |||
T-cell depletion | 51 | 28 | 21 |
Cyclo alone | 52 | 20 | 28 |
Cyclo + mtx | 55 | 25 | 20 |
Other | 28 | 22 | 50 |
Source of stem cells3-150,3-151 | |||
BM | 54 | 25 | 21 |
PB | 36 | 24 | 40 |
aGvHD3-150,3-151 | |||
Grade 0 | 69 | 15 | 16 |
Grade I | 46 | 36 | 18 |
Grade II | 34 | 31 | 35 |
Grade III | 40 | 18 | 42 |
Grade IV | 75 | 5 | 20 |
Risk factor . | cGvHD, row % . | ||
---|---|---|---|
No . | Limited . | Extensive . | |
All patients | 52 | 25 | 23 |
Sex3-150,3-151 | |||
Male | 48 | 25 | 27 |
Female | 58 | 24 | 18 |
Age, y3-150,3-151 | |||
Younger than 20 | 68 | 21 | 11 |
20-40 | 51 | 25 | 24 |
Older than 40 | 50 | 25 | 25 |
Donor-recipient sex combination3-150,3-151 | |||
Donor (F) + recipient (M) | 41 | 26 | 33 |
Other | 56 | 24 | 20 |
Interval between diagnosis and transplantation | |||
Shorter than 12 mo | 52 | 23 | 25 |
12 mo or longer | 52 | 26 | 22 |
aGvHD prevention3-150,3-151 | |||
T-cell depletion | 51 | 28 | 21 |
Cyclo alone | 52 | 20 | 28 |
Cyclo + mtx | 55 | 25 | 20 |
Other | 28 | 22 | 50 |
Source of stem cells3-150,3-151 | |||
BM | 54 | 25 | 21 |
PB | 36 | 24 | 40 |
aGvHD3-150,3-151 | |||
Grade 0 | 69 | 15 | 16 |
Grade I | 46 | 36 | 18 |
Grade II | 34 | 31 | 35 |
Grade III | 40 | 18 | 42 |
Grade IV | 75 | 5 | 20 |
Abbreviations are explained in Table 1.
Indicates that the χ2 test for the comparison of the incidence of cGvHD (yes versus no) has a P < .05.
Indicates that the χ2 test for a linear trend over the grades from no to extensive (severity) comparing the risk factor levels is significant at the .05 level.