Table 4.

PFS in patients with high-risk cytogenetics in recent trials for relapsed multiple myeloma

Median PFS
RegimenAll high riskDel(17p)t(4;14)
KRd vs Rd19  23.1 vs 13.9 mo (HR = 0.70) 24.5 vs 11.1 mo (HR = NA) 23.1 vs 16.7 mo (HR = NA) 
Kd vs Vd35  8.8 vs 6.0 mo (HR = 0.646) 7.6 vs 4.9 mo (HR = NA) 10.1 vs 6.8 mo (HR = NA) 
Elotuzumab-Rd vs Rd17  NA 21.2 vs 14.9 mo (HR = 0.70) 15.8 vs 5.5 mo (HR = 0.52) 
IRD vs Rd37  21.4 vs 9.7 mo (HR = 0.543) 21.4 vs 9.7 mo (HR = 0.596) 18.5 vs 12 mo (HR = 0.645) 
DRd vs Rd16  NR vs 10.2 (HR = 0.44) NA NA 
Median PFS
RegimenAll high riskDel(17p)t(4;14)
KRd vs Rd19  23.1 vs 13.9 mo (HR = 0.70) 24.5 vs 11.1 mo (HR = NA) 23.1 vs 16.7 mo (HR = NA) 
Kd vs Vd35  8.8 vs 6.0 mo (HR = 0.646) 7.6 vs 4.9 mo (HR = NA) 10.1 vs 6.8 mo (HR = NA) 
Elotuzumab-Rd vs Rd17  NA 21.2 vs 14.9 mo (HR = 0.70) 15.8 vs 5.5 mo (HR = 0.52) 
IRD vs Rd37  21.4 vs 9.7 mo (HR = 0.543) 21.4 vs 9.7 mo (HR = 0.596) 18.5 vs 12 mo (HR = 0.645) 
DRd vs Rd16  NR vs 10.2 (HR = 0.44) NA NA 

DRd, daratamumab, lenalidomide, dexamethasone; IRD, ixazomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone; Kd, carfilzomib, dexamethasone; KRd, carfilzomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone; NA, not applicable.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal