Table 1.

Performances and safety of proximal compression ultrasonography for diagnosing DVT in outcome management studies

ReferencePatients, No.Prevalence of DVT, %Three-month thromboembolic risk, % (95% CI)*
Birdwell et al27  405 16 0.6 (0.1-2.1) 
Wells et al10  1702 24 0.7 (0.3-1.2) 
Bernardi et al28  946 28 0.4 (0-0.9) 
Wells et al30  593 16 0.6 (0.1-1.8) 
Kraaijenhagen et al29  1756 22 0.7 (0.3-1.6) 
Pooled estimate 5876 23 0.5 (0.4-0.9) 
ReferencePatients, No.Prevalence of DVT, %Three-month thromboembolic risk, % (95% CI)*
Birdwell et al27  405 16 0.6 (0.1-2.1) 
Wells et al10  1702 24 0.7 (0.3-1.2) 
Bernardi et al28  946 28 0.4 (0-0.9) 
Wells et al30  593 16 0.6 (0.1-1.8) 
Kraaijenhagen et al29  1756 22 0.7 (0.3-1.6) 
Pooled estimate 5876 23 0.5 (0.4-0.9) 

Distal DVTs were not searched for in these studies.

*

During 3-mo follow-up in patients left untreated after normal proximal CUS.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal