Table 3.

Outcome with different treatment approaches in older patients with ALL

ApproachReference (s)Age range (y)Studies (N)Patients (N)CR*Early death*Survival
Population-based studies 2, 15, 26, 27 >65 n.r. 40% n.r. 6%-30% 
Palliative treatment 29-31, 33 60-91 94 43% (34%-53%) 24% (18%-42%) 7 (3-10) mo 
Intensive chemotherapy designed for adult ALL without focus on older patients 17, 32, 34-43 60-92 12 519 56% (40%-81%) 23% (6%-42%) 14% (3%-29%) 
ApproachReference (s)Age range (y)Studies (N)Patients (N)CR*Early death*Survival
Population-based studies 2, 15, 26, 27 >65 n.r. 40% n.r. 6%-30% 
Palliative treatment 29-31, 33 60-91 94 43% (34%-53%) 24% (18%-42%) 7 (3-10) mo 
Intensive chemotherapy designed for adult ALL without focus on older patients 17, 32, 34-43 60-92 12 519 56% (40%-81%) 23% (6%-42%) 14% (3%-29%) 

Adapted from Gökbuget.

n.r., not reported.

*

Weighted means and range from cited studies for CR rates, early death rates, and survival.

Weighted means and ranges for survival probability at 2 or more years as reported in the cited studies or median survival time and ranges, respectively.

From Toft et al.27 

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal