Table 3.

Results in response-adapted studies of increased therapy in PET-positive groups

Trial nameReferenceStageNo. of PET-positive patientsNo. of cycles and type of initial therapy% Interim PET positive5-Point PET score (if used)No. of cycles and type of post-PET therapyTime to analysis (y)PFS (%)OS (%)
EORTC HD10 29 I-II 361 2 ABVD 19  2 ABVD + INRT 77 89 
       2 BEACOPPescalated + INRT  91 96 
RATHL II with adverse features, III, IV 182 2 ABVD 16 4-5 4 BEACOPPescalated or 6 BEACOPP-14 68 87 
GITIL/FIL 0607 26 II with adverse features, III, IV 98 2 ABVD 20 4-5 4 BEACOPPescalated + 4 BEACOPPbaseline with or without rituximab 66 — 
SWOG S0816 30 III, IV 60 2 ABVD 18 4-5 6 BEACOPPescalated 64 — 
FIL HD0801 31 IIB-IV 103 2 ABVD 20 3-5 4 IGEV + BEAM 76 — 
Trial nameReferenceStageNo. of PET-positive patientsNo. of cycles and type of initial therapy% Interim PET positive5-Point PET score (if used)No. of cycles and type of post-PET therapyTime to analysis (y)PFS (%)OS (%)
EORTC HD10 29 I-II 361 2 ABVD 19  2 ABVD + INRT 77 89 
       2 BEACOPPescalated + INRT  91 96 
RATHL II with adverse features, III, IV 182 2 ABVD 16 4-5 4 BEACOPPescalated or 6 BEACOPP-14 68 87 
GITIL/FIL 0607 26 II with adverse features, III, IV 98 2 ABVD 20 4-5 4 BEACOPPescalated + 4 BEACOPPbaseline with or without rituximab 66 — 
SWOG S0816 30 III, IV 60 2 ABVD 18 4-5 6 BEACOPPescalated 64 — 
FIL HD0801 31 IIB-IV 103 2 ABVD 20 3-5 4 IGEV + BEAM 76 — 

BEAM, carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan; IGEV, ifosfamide, gemcitabine, and vinorelbine.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal