Results in response-adapted studies of increased therapy in PET-positive groups
Trial name . | Reference . | Stage . | No. of PET-positive patients . | No. of cycles and type of initial therapy . | % Interim PET positive . | 5-Point PET score (if used) . | No. of cycles and type of post-PET therapy . | Time to analysis (y) . | PFS (%) . | OS (%) . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EORTC HD10 | 29 | I-II | 361 | 2 ABVD | 19 | 2 ABVD + INRT | 5 | 77 | 89 | |
2 BEACOPPescalated + INRT | 91 | 96 | ||||||||
RATHL | 2 | II with adverse features, III, IV | 182 | 2 ABVD | 16 | 4-5 | 4 BEACOPPescalated or 6 BEACOPP-14 | 3 | 68 | 87 |
GITIL/FIL 0607 | 26 | II with adverse features, III, IV | 98 | 2 ABVD | 20 | 4-5 | 4 BEACOPPescalated + 4 BEACOPPbaseline with or without rituximab | 2 | 66 | — |
SWOG S0816 | 30 | III, IV | 60 | 2 ABVD | 18 | 4-5 | 6 BEACOPPescalated | 2 | 64 | — |
FIL HD0801 | 31 | IIB-IV | 103 | 2 ABVD | 20 | 3-5 | 4 IGEV + BEAM | 2 | 76 | — |
Trial name . | Reference . | Stage . | No. of PET-positive patients . | No. of cycles and type of initial therapy . | % Interim PET positive . | 5-Point PET score (if used) . | No. of cycles and type of post-PET therapy . | Time to analysis (y) . | PFS (%) . | OS (%) . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EORTC HD10 | 29 | I-II | 361 | 2 ABVD | 19 | 2 ABVD + INRT | 5 | 77 | 89 | |
2 BEACOPPescalated + INRT | 91 | 96 | ||||||||
RATHL | 2 | II with adverse features, III, IV | 182 | 2 ABVD | 16 | 4-5 | 4 BEACOPPescalated or 6 BEACOPP-14 | 3 | 68 | 87 |
GITIL/FIL 0607 | 26 | II with adverse features, III, IV | 98 | 2 ABVD | 20 | 4-5 | 4 BEACOPPescalated + 4 BEACOPPbaseline with or without rituximab | 2 | 66 | — |
SWOG S0816 | 30 | III, IV | 60 | 2 ABVD | 18 | 4-5 | 6 BEACOPPescalated | 2 | 64 | — |
FIL HD0801 | 31 | IIB-IV | 103 | 2 ABVD | 20 | 3-5 | 4 IGEV + BEAM | 2 | 76 | — |
BEAM, carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan; IGEV, ifosfamide, gemcitabine, and vinorelbine.