Table 2.

Results in response-adapted studies of reduced therapy in PET-negative groups

Trial nameReferenceStageNo. of PET-negative patientsNo. of cycles and type of initial therapy% Interim PET negative5-Point PET score (if used)No. of cycles and type of post-PET therapyTime to analysis (y)PFS (%)OS (%)
NCRI RAPID IA-IIA nonbulky 420 3 ABVD 75 1-2 Nil vs IFRT 90.8 vs 94.6 99 vs 97.1 
EORTC HD10 25 I-II        
  Favorable risk 381 2 ABVD 86  1 ABVD + INRT vs 2 ABVD  100 vs 94.9 — 
  Unfavorable risk 519  75  2 ABVD + INRT vs 4 ABVD  97.3 vs 94.7 — 
RATHL II with adverse features, III, IV 935 2 ABVD 84 1-3 4 ABVD 85.7 97.2 
       4 AVD  84.4 97.6 
GITIL/FIL 0607 26 II with adverse features, III, IV 195 2 ABVD 80 1-3 4 ABVD + IFRT 94 — 
       4 ABVD  88  
GHSG HD15 27 IIBX, III, IV 548 6-8 BEACOPPescalated
or 8 BEACOPP-14 
74 (of partial responses)  No IFRT for PET negative 92.6 95 
LYSA AHL2011 28 IIB, III, IV 688 2 BEACOPPescalated 88  4 BEACOPPescalated 94 — 
       4 ABVD  92  
Trial nameReferenceStageNo. of PET-negative patientsNo. of cycles and type of initial therapy% Interim PET negative5-Point PET score (if used)No. of cycles and type of post-PET therapyTime to analysis (y)PFS (%)OS (%)
NCRI RAPID IA-IIA nonbulky 420 3 ABVD 75 1-2 Nil vs IFRT 90.8 vs 94.6 99 vs 97.1 
EORTC HD10 25 I-II        
  Favorable risk 381 2 ABVD 86  1 ABVD + INRT vs 2 ABVD  100 vs 94.9 — 
  Unfavorable risk 519  75  2 ABVD + INRT vs 4 ABVD  97.3 vs 94.7 — 
RATHL II with adverse features, III, IV 935 2 ABVD 84 1-3 4 ABVD 85.7 97.2 
       4 AVD  84.4 97.6 
GITIL/FIL 0607 26 II with adverse features, III, IV 195 2 ABVD 80 1-3 4 ABVD + IFRT 94 — 
       4 ABVD  88  
GHSG HD15 27 IIBX, III, IV 548 6-8 BEACOPPescalated
or 8 BEACOPP-14 
74 (of partial responses)  No IFRT for PET negative 92.6 95 
LYSA AHL2011 28 IIB, III, IV 688 2 BEACOPPescalated 88  4 BEACOPPescalated 94 — 
       4 ABVD  92  

AVD, same as ABVD without bleomycin.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal