Table 1.

Demographics of the overall cohort (n = 65)

DemographicsTotal cohort (n = 65)
Sex  
 Male 39 (60.0) 
 Female 26 (40.0) 
Age, y  
 Median age at diagnosis (range) 64 (37-83) 
 <40 1 (1.5) 
 40-49 5 (7.7) 
 50-59 13 (20.0) 
 60-69 26 (40.0) 
 70-79 15 (23.1) 
 80+ 5 (7.7) 
Diagnosis  
 e-MF 6 (9.2) 
 SS* 59 (90.8) 
 LCT at diagnosis 3 (4.6) 
Stage at diagnosis  
 IA 0 (0.0) 
 IB 5 (7.7) 
 IIA 1 (1.5) 
 IIB 1 (1.5) 
 IIIA 15 (23.1) 
 IIIB 12 (18.5) 
 IVA1 27 (41.5) 
 IVA2 1 (1.5) 
 IVB 2 (3.1) 
Tumor skin score  
 T1 0 (0.0) 
 T2 6 (9.2) 
 T3 0 (0.0) 
 T4 59 (90.8) 
Nodal involvement  
 N0 30 (46.1) 
 N1 26 (40.0) 
 N2 4 (6.2) 
 N3 1 (1.5) 
 Nx 4 (6.2) 
Visceral involvement  
 M0 63 (96.9) 
 M1 2 (3.1) 
Blood involvement*  
 B0 16 (24.6) 
 B0a 1 (1.5) 
 B0b 2 (3.1) 
 B1 17 (26.2) 
 B2 29 (44.6) 
Clonal arrangement (n = 50)  
 Monoclonal 45 (69.2) 
 Polyclonal 4 (6.2) 
 Oligoclonal 1 (1.5) 
 Unknown 15 (23.1) 
Median number of treatment lines (range) 4 (1-13) 
ECP device used  
 UVAR-XTS 12 (18.5) 
 Therakos CELLEX 47 (72.3) 
 Both 6 (9.2) 
DemographicsTotal cohort (n = 65)
Sex  
 Male 39 (60.0) 
 Female 26 (40.0) 
Age, y  
 Median age at diagnosis (range) 64 (37-83) 
 <40 1 (1.5) 
 40-49 5 (7.7) 
 50-59 13 (20.0) 
 60-69 26 (40.0) 
 70-79 15 (23.1) 
 80+ 5 (7.7) 
Diagnosis  
 e-MF 6 (9.2) 
 SS* 59 (90.8) 
 LCT at diagnosis 3 (4.6) 
Stage at diagnosis  
 IA 0 (0.0) 
 IB 5 (7.7) 
 IIA 1 (1.5) 
 IIB 1 (1.5) 
 IIIA 15 (23.1) 
 IIIB 12 (18.5) 
 IVA1 27 (41.5) 
 IVA2 1 (1.5) 
 IVB 2 (3.1) 
Tumor skin score  
 T1 0 (0.0) 
 T2 6 (9.2) 
 T3 0 (0.0) 
 T4 59 (90.8) 
Nodal involvement  
 N0 30 (46.1) 
 N1 26 (40.0) 
 N2 4 (6.2) 
 N3 1 (1.5) 
 Nx 4 (6.2) 
Visceral involvement  
 M0 63 (96.9) 
 M1 2 (3.1) 
Blood involvement*  
 B0 16 (24.6) 
 B0a 1 (1.5) 
 B0b 2 (3.1) 
 B1 17 (26.2) 
 B2 29 (44.6) 
Clonal arrangement (n = 50)  
 Monoclonal 45 (69.2) 
 Polyclonal 4 (6.2) 
 Oligoclonal 1 (1.5) 
 Unknown 15 (23.1) 
Median number of treatment lines (range) 4 (1-13) 
ECP device used  
 UVAR-XTS 12 (18.5) 
 Therakos CELLEX 47 (72.3) 
 Both 6 (9.2) 
*

The difference between the number of patients who received a diagnosis of SS (n = 59) and those who had B2 disease at diagnosis (n = 29) was due to (i) the varying criteria used for a diagnosis of SS during the course of the study according to the diagnostic criteria used at the time of commencing ECP (ie, utilization of CD4:8 ratio by flow cytometry and prior to the updated TNMB staging by Olsen et al in 200726 ) and (ii) some patients without a detectable clone in the blood at diagnosis subsequently detected a clone in the peripheral blood at a later date.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal