Table 1

Assessment of interobserver reliability for bone marrow histology criteria

CriterionStrength of association*95% CI
Myelofibrosis criteria (5-point scale)   
    WHO diagnosis 2.1 1.8-2.4 
    Reticulin grade 5.1 4.0-6.4 
Cellularity criteria (3-point scale)   
    Overall 8.3 5.5-12.6 
    Erythroid 3.9 2.8-5.3 
    Granulocytic 5.0 3.4-7.2 
    Megakaryocytic 5.1 4.0-6.4 
Megakaryocyte morphology (3-point scale)   
    Staghorn megakaryocytes 2.5 1.9-3.3 
    Cloud-like megakaryocytes 2.2 1.7-2.8 
    Dysplastic megakaryocytes 1.4 1.1-1.7 
    Pyknotic megakaryocytes 3.2 2.4-4.2 
    Bare megakaryocyte nuclei 7.7 4.3-13.6 
    Megakaryocyte size 3.2 2.3-4.5 
Megakaryocyte clustering (3-point scale)   
    Number of clusters 9.1 6.0-13.9 
    Type of clusters (none, loose, tight) 2.7 2.2-3.3 
    Size of clusters (none, small, large) 6.8 4.7-9.7 
Miscellaneous (2-point scale)   
    Paratrabecular megakaryocytes 4.4 3.1-6.1 
    New bone formation 10.1 4.8-21.8 
CriterionStrength of association*95% CI
Myelofibrosis criteria (5-point scale)   
    WHO diagnosis 2.1 1.8-2.4 
    Reticulin grade 5.1 4.0-6.4 
Cellularity criteria (3-point scale)   
    Overall 8.3 5.5-12.6 
    Erythroid 3.9 2.8-5.3 
    Granulocytic 5.0 3.4-7.2 
    Megakaryocytic 5.1 4.0-6.4 
Megakaryocyte morphology (3-point scale)   
    Staghorn megakaryocytes 2.5 1.9-3.3 
    Cloud-like megakaryocytes 2.2 1.7-2.8 
    Dysplastic megakaryocytes 1.4 1.1-1.7 
    Pyknotic megakaryocytes 3.2 2.4-4.2 
    Bare megakaryocyte nuclei 7.7 4.3-13.6 
    Megakaryocyte size 3.2 2.3-4.5 
Megakaryocyte clustering (3-point scale)   
    Number of clusters 9.1 6.0-13.9 
    Type of clusters (none, loose, tight) 2.7 2.2-3.3 
    Size of clusters (none, small, large) 6.8 4.7-9.7 
Miscellaneous (2-point scale)   
    Paratrabecular megakaryocytes 4.4 3.1-6.1 
    New bone formation 10.1 4.8-21.8 

*Higher scores for strength of association represent stronger interobserver reliability, with a score of 1 indicating no agreement beyond chance.

†The categories of normal (score = 0) and mildly increased (score = 1) were combined because of small numbers in the normal category and to allow comparison with the other criteria for cellularity (all on a 3-point scale).

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal