Assessment of interobserver reliability for bone marrow histology criteria
Criterion . | Strength of association* . | 95% CI . |
---|---|---|
Myelofibrosis criteria (5-point scale) | ||
WHO diagnosis | 2.1 | 1.8-2.4 |
Reticulin grade | 5.1 | 4.0-6.4 |
Cellularity criteria (3-point scale) | ||
Overall | 8.3 | 5.5-12.6 |
Erythroid | 3.9 | 2.8-5.3 |
Granulocytic | 5.0 | 3.4-7.2 |
Megakaryocytic† | 5.1 | 4.0-6.4 |
Megakaryocyte morphology (3-point scale) | ||
Staghorn megakaryocytes | 2.5 | 1.9-3.3 |
Cloud-like megakaryocytes | 2.2 | 1.7-2.8 |
Dysplastic megakaryocytes | 1.4 | 1.1-1.7 |
Pyknotic megakaryocytes | 3.2 | 2.4-4.2 |
Bare megakaryocyte nuclei | 7.7 | 4.3-13.6 |
Megakaryocyte size | 3.2 | 2.3-4.5 |
Megakaryocyte clustering (3-point scale) | ||
Number of clusters | 9.1 | 6.0-13.9 |
Type of clusters (none, loose, tight) | 2.7 | 2.2-3.3 |
Size of clusters (none, small, large) | 6.8 | 4.7-9.7 |
Miscellaneous (2-point scale) | ||
Paratrabecular megakaryocytes | 4.4 | 3.1-6.1 |
New bone formation | 10.1 | 4.8-21.8 |
Criterion . | Strength of association* . | 95% CI . |
---|---|---|
Myelofibrosis criteria (5-point scale) | ||
WHO diagnosis | 2.1 | 1.8-2.4 |
Reticulin grade | 5.1 | 4.0-6.4 |
Cellularity criteria (3-point scale) | ||
Overall | 8.3 | 5.5-12.6 |
Erythroid | 3.9 | 2.8-5.3 |
Granulocytic | 5.0 | 3.4-7.2 |
Megakaryocytic† | 5.1 | 4.0-6.4 |
Megakaryocyte morphology (3-point scale) | ||
Staghorn megakaryocytes | 2.5 | 1.9-3.3 |
Cloud-like megakaryocytes | 2.2 | 1.7-2.8 |
Dysplastic megakaryocytes | 1.4 | 1.1-1.7 |
Pyknotic megakaryocytes | 3.2 | 2.4-4.2 |
Bare megakaryocyte nuclei | 7.7 | 4.3-13.6 |
Megakaryocyte size | 3.2 | 2.3-4.5 |
Megakaryocyte clustering (3-point scale) | ||
Number of clusters | 9.1 | 6.0-13.9 |
Type of clusters (none, loose, tight) | 2.7 | 2.2-3.3 |
Size of clusters (none, small, large) | 6.8 | 4.7-9.7 |
Miscellaneous (2-point scale) | ||
Paratrabecular megakaryocytes | 4.4 | 3.1-6.1 |
New bone formation | 10.1 | 4.8-21.8 |
*Higher scores for strength of association represent stronger interobserver reliability, with a score of 1 indicating no agreement beyond chance.
†The categories of normal (score = 0) and mildly increased (score = 1) were combined because of small numbers in the normal category and to allow comparison with the other criteria for cellularity (all on a 3-point scale).