Table 1.

Selected large multicenter trials of older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

PublicationsAgeNo of PtsCR %CCR at 45 yrs %Comments
Abbreviations: TG, thioguanine; DFS, disease-free survival; ara-C, cytarabine; GM-CSF, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor; CR, complete response 
Goldstone et al, 20015  56–80 1311 50–62 15–18 6-TG added to induction superior to etoposide (p = 0.002).
 No benefit from more than 1–2 courses of consolidation. 
Lowenberg et al,199835  60–88 489 38–47 7–13 Mitoxantrone-containing induction regimen resulted in a slightly higher CR rate over daunorubicin-containing induction but had no significant effect on DFS or survival benefit to ara-C maintenance 
Rowe et al, 200436  56–86 362 42 No difference in disease-free survival using idarubicin, mitoxantrone, or daunorubicin during induction.
 Priming with GM-CSF did not improve response rate. 
Stone et al, 199538  >60 388 53 13 Shorter duration of neutropenia in patients randomized to GM-CSF vs. placebo (p = 0.02) but no difference in life-threatening infections or response rate. 
Godwin et al, 199837  56–88 234 45 Not given G-CSF reduced time to neutrophil recovery (compared to placebo) but did not improve CR rate, survival, or hospitalization days 
Mayer et al, 19944  60–86 346 47 16 Intensification of cytarabine dose during post-remission therapy did not improve outcome. 
Buchner et al, 20036  60–82 297 60 13 Prolonged maintenance therapy resulted in modest improvements in relapse-free survival for poor-risk patients. 
PublicationsAgeNo of PtsCR %CCR at 45 yrs %Comments
Abbreviations: TG, thioguanine; DFS, disease-free survival; ara-C, cytarabine; GM-CSF, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor; CR, complete response 
Goldstone et al, 20015  56–80 1311 50–62 15–18 6-TG added to induction superior to etoposide (p = 0.002).
 No benefit from more than 1–2 courses of consolidation. 
Lowenberg et al,199835  60–88 489 38–47 7–13 Mitoxantrone-containing induction regimen resulted in a slightly higher CR rate over daunorubicin-containing induction but had no significant effect on DFS or survival benefit to ara-C maintenance 
Rowe et al, 200436  56–86 362 42 No difference in disease-free survival using idarubicin, mitoxantrone, or daunorubicin during induction.
 Priming with GM-CSF did not improve response rate. 
Stone et al, 199538  >60 388 53 13 Shorter duration of neutropenia in patients randomized to GM-CSF vs. placebo (p = 0.02) but no difference in life-threatening infections or response rate. 
Godwin et al, 199837  56–88 234 45 Not given G-CSF reduced time to neutrophil recovery (compared to placebo) but did not improve CR rate, survival, or hospitalization days 
Mayer et al, 19944  60–86 346 47 16 Intensification of cytarabine dose during post-remission therapy did not improve outcome. 
Buchner et al, 20036  60–82 297 60 13 Prolonged maintenance therapy resulted in modest improvements in relapse-free survival for poor-risk patients. 

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal