Table 2.

Differential outcome of patients with MDS and AML after HMA failure based on induction strategy

MDSAML
Global (n = 307)7+3 (n = 173)IDAC (n = 44)PNA (n = 90)PGlobal (n = 59)7+3 (n = 30)IDAC (n = 12)PNA (n = 17)P
Response, CR+CRi% 41 39 64 34 .04 32 63 25 21 .43 
8-wk mortality, % 6.5 8.7 2.3 4.4 .19 15.3 16.7 23.5 .21 
Median OS, mo 10.8 9.3 10.9 12.9 .52 6.0 8.0 6.9 4.4 .06 
Median CIR, mo 11.6 11.3 12.5 14.1 .60 14.4 16.6 13.0 13.9 .15 
Responders undergoing Allo, % 39.7 37.3 64.3 22.6 <.01 42 42 67 25 .54 
MDSAML
Global (n = 307)7+3 (n = 173)IDAC (n = 44)PNA (n = 90)PGlobal (n = 59)7+3 (n = 30)IDAC (n = 12)PNA (n = 17)P
Response, CR+CRi% 41 39 64 34 .04 32 63 25 21 .43 
8-wk mortality, % 6.5 8.7 2.3 4.4 .19 15.3 16.7 23.5 .21 
Median OS, mo 10.8 9.3 10.9 12.9 .52 6.0 8.0 6.9 4.4 .06 
Median CIR, mo 11.6 11.3 12.5 14.1 .60 14.4 16.6 13.0 13.9 .15 
Responders undergoing Allo, % 39.7 37.3 64.3 22.6 <.01 42 42 67 25 .54 

CR, complete remission; CRi, complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery; Responders undergoing Allo, percentage of responders to induction chemotherapy undergoing allogeneic transplant.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal