Table 3.

Characteristics of patients misdiagnosed as having primary ITP compared with patients who were properly diagnosed

All misdiagnosed patients (n = 46)Patients correctly diagnosed as primary ITP (n = 259)
Age, median (IQR), y 59.5 (38.8-73.5) 50 (32.5-64) 
Female, n (%) 25 (54.3) 163 (62.9) 
Lowest platelet count ever, median (IQR) 43 (15-62.5) 14 (3.5-45.5) 
Patients with platelet nadir <20 × 109/L, n (%) 13 (28.3) 146 (56.4) 
No bleeding, n (%) 9 (19.6) 39 (15.1) 
Minor bleeding only, n (%) 21 (45.7) 73 (28.2) 
Any grade 2 bleed, n (%) 16 (34.8) 147 (56.8) 
Any nonskin grade 2 bleed, n (%) 4 (8.7) 123 (47.5) 
ICH, n (%) 1 (2.2) 6 (2.3) 
Number of ITP treatments until last follow-up, median (IQR) 1 (0-2) 3 (1-5) 
Untreated patients, n (%) 15 (32.6) 53 (20.5) 
All misdiagnosed patients (n = 46)Patients correctly diagnosed as primary ITP (n = 259)
Age, median (IQR), y 59.5 (38.8-73.5) 50 (32.5-64) 
Female, n (%) 25 (54.3) 163 (62.9) 
Lowest platelet count ever, median (IQR) 43 (15-62.5) 14 (3.5-45.5) 
Patients with platelet nadir <20 × 109/L, n (%) 13 (28.3) 146 (56.4) 
No bleeding, n (%) 9 (19.6) 39 (15.1) 
Minor bleeding only, n (%) 21 (45.7) 73 (28.2) 
Any grade 2 bleed, n (%) 16 (34.8) 147 (56.8) 
Any nonskin grade 2 bleed, n (%) 4 (8.7) 123 (47.5) 
ICH, n (%) 1 (2.2) 6 (2.3) 
Number of ITP treatments until last follow-up, median (IQR) 1 (0-2) 3 (1-5) 
Untreated patients, n (%) 15 (32.6) 53 (20.5) 

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal