Table 4

Multivariable analysis for TTF and OS.

VariableTTFOS
HR95% CIPHR95% CIP
Model 1       
 Transfusion dependence: Y vs N 2.07 1.18-3.64 .01 2.04 1.02-4.11 .05 
ASXL1/EZH2: Y vs N 2.05 1.16-3.61 .01 2.46 1.23-4.92 .01 
Model 2       
 DIPSS score: int-2 vs int-1 1.57 0.71-3.49 .27 1.40 0.53-3.69 .50 
 DIPSS score: high vs int-1 2.79 1.24-6.31 .01 3.00 1.12-8.03 .03 
ASXL1/EZH2 mutation: Y vs N 1.87 1.05-3.33 .04 2.28 1.13-4.61 .02 
VariableTTFOS
HR95% CIPHR95% CIP
Model 1       
 Transfusion dependence: Y vs N 2.07 1.18-3.64 .01 2.04 1.02-4.11 .05 
ASXL1/EZH2: Y vs N 2.05 1.16-3.61 .01 2.46 1.23-4.92 .01 
Model 2       
 DIPSS score: int-2 vs int-1 1.57 0.71-3.49 .27 1.40 0.53-3.69 .50 
 DIPSS score: high vs int-1 2.79 1.24-6.31 .01 3.00 1.12-8.03 .03 
ASXL1/EZH2 mutation: Y vs N 1.87 1.05-3.33 .04 2.28 1.13-4.61 .02 

ASXL1/EZH2 was tested in 2 models against transfusion dependence and DIPSS.

int-1, intermediate-1; int-2, intermediate-2; N, no; Y, yes.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal