Table 1.

Patient characteristics

Old strategy (N = 153)New strategy (N = 125)P*
Median age (range) 46 (17-65) 50 (18-66) .42 
Recipient VZV seropositive (%) 66 (99) 101 (98) .71 
Donor VZV seropositive (%) 65 (100) 101 (98) .69 
VZV prophylaxis drug (%)    
 Acyclovir 137 (90) 65 (52) <.01 
 Valacyclovir 16 (10) 60 (48) 
Underlying disease (%)    
 Acute leukemia 84 (55) 75 (60) .85 
 MDS 19 (12) 11 (9) 
 CLL/lymphoma 26 (17) 22 (18) 
 CML 10 (7) 7 (5) 
 Other 14 (9) 10 (8) 
Donor§(%)    
 Sibling 87 (57) 51 (41) .02 
 MUD 48 (31) 58 (46) 
 MMUD 16 (11) 16 (13) 
 Haploidentical 2 (1) 0 (0) 
Stem cell source (%)    
 Peripheral blood 127 (83) 120 (96) <.01 
 Bone marrow 23 (15) 4 (3) 
 Umbilical cord 3 (2) 1 (1) 
Conditioning (%)    
 FluBuATG 53 (35) 36 (29) .24 
 FluBuATG + TBI 89 (58) 84 (67) 
 Other‖ 11 (7) 5 (4) 
GVHD prophylaxis (%)    
 CSA+MTX 147 (96) 122 (98) .71 
 Other 6 (4) 3 (2) 
Acute GVHD (%)    
 None 83 (54) 59 (47) .36 
 I 35 (23) 37 (30) 
 II 25 (16) 25 (20) 
 III 9 (6) 3 (2) 
 IV 1 (1) 1 (1) 
Chronic GVHD (%)    
 None 109 (71) 67 (54) <.01 
 No systemic Rx 19 (12) 19 (15) 
 Systemic Rx 25 (16) 39 (31) 
Significant GVHD#(%)    
 No 93 (61) 57 (46) .02 
 Yes 60 (39) 68 (54) 
Old strategy (N = 153)New strategy (N = 125)P*
Median age (range) 46 (17-65) 50 (18-66) .42 
Recipient VZV seropositive (%) 66 (99) 101 (98) .71 
Donor VZV seropositive (%) 65 (100) 101 (98) .69 
VZV prophylaxis drug (%)    
 Acyclovir 137 (90) 65 (52) <.01 
 Valacyclovir 16 (10) 60 (48) 
Underlying disease (%)    
 Acute leukemia 84 (55) 75 (60) .85 
 MDS 19 (12) 11 (9) 
 CLL/lymphoma 26 (17) 22 (18) 
 CML 10 (7) 7 (5) 
 Other 14 (9) 10 (8) 
Donor§(%)    
 Sibling 87 (57) 51 (41) .02 
 MUD 48 (31) 58 (46) 
 MMUD 16 (11) 16 (13) 
 Haploidentical 2 (1) 0 (0) 
Stem cell source (%)    
 Peripheral blood 127 (83) 120 (96) <.01 
 Bone marrow 23 (15) 4 (3) 
 Umbilical cord 3 (2) 1 (1) 
Conditioning (%)    
 FluBuATG 53 (35) 36 (29) .24 
 FluBuATG + TBI 89 (58) 84 (67) 
 Other‖ 11 (7) 5 (4) 
GVHD prophylaxis (%)    
 CSA+MTX 147 (96) 122 (98) .71 
 Other 6 (4) 3 (2) 
Acute GVHD (%)    
 None 83 (54) 59 (47) .36 
 I 35 (23) 37 (30) 
 II 25 (16) 25 (20) 
 III 9 (6) 3 (2) 
 IV 1 (1) 1 (1) 
Chronic GVHD (%)    
 None 109 (71) 67 (54) <.01 
 No systemic Rx 19 (12) 19 (15) 
 Systemic Rx 25 (16) 39 (31) 
Significant GVHD#(%)    
 No 93 (61) 57 (46) .02 
 Yes 60 (39) 68 (54) 

ATG, antithymocyte globulin; Bu, busulfan; CLL, chronic lymphocytic leukemia; CML, chronic myeloid leukemia; CSA, cyclosporine A; Flu, fludarabine; MDS, myelodysplastic syndrome; MMUD; mismatched unrelated donor; MTX, methotrexate; MUD, matched unrelated donor; Rx, treatment; TBI, total body irradiation.

*

For ordinal variables, Mann-Whitney U test was used, and for nominal variables, χ2 or Fisher’s exact test was used as appropriate, using SigmaPlot 13 (Systat, San Jose, CA).

Of 67 recipients or 65 donors for whom VZV serostatus was available.

Of 103 recipients and donors for whom VZV serostatus was available.

§

Sibling = HLA-matched sibling; MUD = 8/8 allele-matched unrelated donor; MMUD (mismatched unrelated donor) included 6-7/8 allele-matched unrelated donors.

‖Other conditioning regimens included cyclophosphamide 200 mg/m2 plus ATG 4.5 mg/kg (n = 6 in the old group and n = 3 in the new group) and myeloablative conditioning composed of combinations of melphalan, fludarabine, etoposide, or busulfan with ATG (n = 2 in the old group and n = 2 in the new group) or cyclophosphamide, etoposide, or busulfan without ATG (n = 3 in the old group).

Other included cyclosporine (CSA) alone (n = 4 in the old group), prednisone (n = 1 in the old group and n = 2 in the new group), and mycophenolate (1 in each group).

#

Grades 2-4 acute GVHD and chronic GVHD requiring immunosuppression.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal