Table 5.

Relationship between triplet mismatches and corrected count increments


No. transfusions analyzed

HIMMs

TMMs
CCIs < 8
CCIs ≥ 8
Median when CCIs < 8
Median when CCIs ≥ 8
p2 value
Median when CCIs < 8
Median when CCIs ≥ 8
p2 value
145   378   6 (4-10)   4 (2-6)   < .001   13 (9-18)   11 (6-14)   < .001  
122*
 
246*
 
6 (4-9)
 
4 (1-6)
 
< .001
 
13 (8-18)
 
12 (4-15)
 
= .001
 

No. transfusions analyzed

HIMMs

TMMs
CCIs < 8
CCIs ≥ 8
Median when CCIs < 8
Median when CCIs ≥ 8
p2 value
Median when CCIs < 8
Median when CCIs ≥ 8
p2 value
145   378   6 (4-10)   4 (2-6)   < .001   13 (9-18)   11 (6-14)   < .001  
122*
 
246*
 
6 (4-9)
 
4 (1-6)
 
< .001
 
13 (8-18)
 
12 (4-15)
 
= .001
 

N = 523. CCIs were calculated for all platelet transfusions. HLAMatchmaker examined HLA compatibility at the triplet level for all donor-recipient pairs and determined the number of highly immunogenic triplet mismatches as well as the total number of triplet mismatches. Transfusions were divided into 2 groups: CCIs less than 8 or CCIs at least 8. The median number of HIMMs and TIMMs are presented, with the first and third quartile values (in parentheses). The 2 cohorts were compared using unpaired, 2-tailed Student t test. The median number of HIMMs and TIMMs are presented, with the first and third quartile values in parentheses.

*

Data presented for all transfusions with the exclusion of patient 11

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal