Table 2.

GRADE summary of evidence for thrombolysis followed by AC vs AC alone in patients with submassive PE

No. of studiesStudy designNo. of patients (%)EffectCertaintyImportance
Thrombolysis followed by ACAC aloneRelative (95% CI)Absolute (95% CI)
Mortality (assessed with: all-cause mortality) 
120  Nonrandomized studies 0/14 (0.0) 1/9 (11.1) Not estimable Not estimable ⊕○○○
Very low 
Critical 
Thrombus resolution (follow-up: 6 months; assessed with: complete or partial resolution) 
121  Nonrandomized studies 5/5 (100.0) 3/3 (100.0) RR, 1.00 (0.64-1.56) 0 fewer per 1000 (360 fewer to 560 more) ⊕○○○
Very low,  
Critical 
Progression (submassive to massive) 
120  Nonrandomized studies 1/14 (7.1) 1/9 (11.1) RR, 0.64 (0.05-9.03) 40 fewer per 1000 (106 fewer to 892 more) ⊕○○○
Very low,  
Critical 
Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (follow-up: 6 months) 
121  Nonrandomized studies 0/5 (0.0) 0/2 (0.0) Not estimable Not estimable ⊕○○○
Very low,  
Critical 
Bleeding (assessed with: unspecified) 
220,21  Nonrandomized studies 0/19 (0.0) 0/9 (0.0) Not pooled Not estimable ⊕○○○
Very low,  
Critical 
No. of studiesStudy designNo. of patients (%)EffectCertaintyImportance
Thrombolysis followed by ACAC aloneRelative (95% CI)Absolute (95% CI)
Mortality (assessed with: all-cause mortality) 
120  Nonrandomized studies 0/14 (0.0) 1/9 (11.1) Not estimable Not estimable ⊕○○○
Very low 
Critical 
Thrombus resolution (follow-up: 6 months; assessed with: complete or partial resolution) 
121  Nonrandomized studies 5/5 (100.0) 3/3 (100.0) RR, 1.00 (0.64-1.56) 0 fewer per 1000 (360 fewer to 560 more) ⊕○○○
Very low,  
Critical 
Progression (submassive to massive) 
120  Nonrandomized studies 1/14 (7.1) 1/9 (11.1) RR, 0.64 (0.05-9.03) 40 fewer per 1000 (106 fewer to 892 more) ⊕○○○
Very low,  
Critical 
Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (follow-up: 6 months) 
121  Nonrandomized studies 0/5 (0.0) 0/2 (0.0) Not estimable Not estimable ⊕○○○
Very low,  
Critical 
Bleeding (assessed with: unspecified) 
220,21  Nonrandomized studies 0/19 (0.0) 0/9 (0.0) Not pooled Not estimable ⊕○○○
Very low,  
Critical 

ROBINS-I, Risk Of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies-of Interventions.

Risk of bias, assessed using ROBINS-I, was judged to be serious because of selection bias without adjustment for potential confounders.

Imprecision because of the small number of included patients and patients with events in the included studies.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal