Table 2.

Detailed information of tisa-cel therapy and related events

CD19 CAR-T characteristicsResult
Time from last nontransplant therapy to CAR T-cell infusion, n (%) median (IQR), mo 17.9 (5.1-44.5) 
Time from diagnosis to tisa-cel infusion, n (%) median (IQR), mo 31.8 (12.2-59.9) 
Time from last HCT to tisa-cel infusion, median (IQR), mo 14.5 (9.2-21.3) 
LD chemotherapy, n (%)  
Cyclophosphamide + fludarabine 465 (98.7) 
Other  6 (1.3) 
Median time between start of LD chemotherapy to CAR T-cell therapy infusion (IQR), d 6.0 (6.0-7.0) 
Median total tisa-cel cell dose, median (IQR) 1.4 × 108 (0.42 × 108 to 5.4 × 108
Time from tisa-cel infusion to neutrophil recovery (event only), median (IQR), d 14.0 (9.0-21.0) 
Time from tisa-cel infusion to CRS onset (event only), median (IQR), d 5.0 (2.0-7.0) 
IV IgG replacement given, n (%) 165 (35.0) 
IgG <600 mg/dL, n (%) 322 (68.4) 
Severity of CRS , n (%)  
Grade 0 193 (41.0) 
Grade 1-2 178 (37.8) 
Grade ≥3 88 (18.7) 
Not reported 12 (2.5) 
Time from tisa-cel infusion to ICANS onset (event only), median (IQR), d 7.0 (5.0-9.0) 
Severity of ICANS   
Grade 0 349 (74.1) 
Grade 1-2 13 (2.8) 
Grade ≥3 33 (6.9) 
Not reported 76 (16.1) 
Corticosteroid use, n (%)  
No 379 (80.5) 
Yes 62 (13.2) 
Missing 30 (6.4) 
Tocilizumab use, n (%)  
No 304 (64.5) 
Yes 148 (31.4) 
Missing 19 (4.0) 
Therapy given for CRS: anakinra, n (%)  
No 274 (58.2) 
Yes 3 (0.6) 
Not reported 194 (41.2) 
Therapy given for CRS: siltuximab, n (%)  
No 262 (55.6) 
Yes 15 (3.2) 
Not reported 194 (41.2) 
History of acute GVHD in patients who received tisa-cel infusion after HCT, n (%) 25 (22.1) 
History of chronic GVHD in patients who received tisa-cel infusion after HCT, n (%) 31 (27.4) 
Year of tisa-cel therapy, n (%)  
2017-2019 331 (70.3) 
2020-2022 140 (29.7) 
Follow-up of survivors, median (range), mo 29.7 (3.0-59.5) 
CD19 CAR-T characteristicsResult
Time from last nontransplant therapy to CAR T-cell infusion, n (%) median (IQR), mo 17.9 (5.1-44.5) 
Time from diagnosis to tisa-cel infusion, n (%) median (IQR), mo 31.8 (12.2-59.9) 
Time from last HCT to tisa-cel infusion, median (IQR), mo 14.5 (9.2-21.3) 
LD chemotherapy, n (%)  
Cyclophosphamide + fludarabine 465 (98.7) 
Other  6 (1.3) 
Median time between start of LD chemotherapy to CAR T-cell therapy infusion (IQR), d 6.0 (6.0-7.0) 
Median total tisa-cel cell dose, median (IQR) 1.4 × 108 (0.42 × 108 to 5.4 × 108
Time from tisa-cel infusion to neutrophil recovery (event only), median (IQR), d 14.0 (9.0-21.0) 
Time from tisa-cel infusion to CRS onset (event only), median (IQR), d 5.0 (2.0-7.0) 
IV IgG replacement given, n (%) 165 (35.0) 
IgG <600 mg/dL, n (%) 322 (68.4) 
Severity of CRS , n (%)  
Grade 0 193 (41.0) 
Grade 1-2 178 (37.8) 
Grade ≥3 88 (18.7) 
Not reported 12 (2.5) 
Time from tisa-cel infusion to ICANS onset (event only), median (IQR), d 7.0 (5.0-9.0) 
Severity of ICANS   
Grade 0 349 (74.1) 
Grade 1-2 13 (2.8) 
Grade ≥3 33 (6.9) 
Not reported 76 (16.1) 
Corticosteroid use, n (%)  
No 379 (80.5) 
Yes 62 (13.2) 
Missing 30 (6.4) 
Tocilizumab use, n (%)  
No 304 (64.5) 
Yes 148 (31.4) 
Missing 19 (4.0) 
Therapy given for CRS: anakinra, n (%)  
No 274 (58.2) 
Yes 3 (0.6) 
Not reported 194 (41.2) 
Therapy given for CRS: siltuximab, n (%)  
No 262 (55.6) 
Yes 15 (3.2) 
Not reported 194 (41.2) 
History of acute GVHD in patients who received tisa-cel infusion after HCT, n (%) 25 (22.1) 
History of chronic GVHD in patients who received tisa-cel infusion after HCT, n (%) 31 (27.4) 
Year of tisa-cel therapy, n (%)  
2017-2019 331 (70.3) 
2020-2022 140 (29.7) 
Follow-up of survivors, median (range), mo 29.7 (3.0-59.5) 

GVHD, graft-versus-host disease; LD, lymphodepleting.

Other regimens included: cytarabine + fludarabine (1), clofarabine + fludarabine (1) and cyclophosphamide + cytarabine + fludarabine (1), fludarabine only (1), not specified (2).

Severity grading according to the American Society of Transplant and Cellular Therapy consensus criteria.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal