Table 2.

Patient disposition for patients enrolled in the expansion cohorts (parts B and D)

Relatlimab monotherapy (240 mg; part B)Nivolumab plus relatlimab (240 mg/160 mg; part D)
CLL (n = 2)DLBCL (n = 2)IL (n = 4)HL (n = 3)Anti–PD-(L)1–naive HL 
(n = 21)
Anti–PD-(L)1–progressed HL 
(n = 20)
DLBCL (n = 15)
Ongoing treatment, n (%) 
Discontinued treatment, n (%) 2 (100.0) 2 (100.0) 4 (100.0) 3 (100.0) 21 (100.0) 20 (100.0) 15 (100.0) 
Disease progression 1 (50.0) 2 (100.0) 4 (100.0) 2 (66.7) 2 (9.5) 12 (60.0) 14 (93.3) 
Study drug toxicity 3 (14.3) 3 (15.0) 
Patient request 1 (4.8) 1 (6.7) 
Withdrew consent 1 (4.8) 1 (5.0) 
Maximum clinical benefit  5 (23.8)  1 (5.0)§  
No longer met study criteria 1 (5.0) 
Completed treatment per protocol 4 (19.0) 1 (5.0) 
Other 1 (50.0) 1 (33.3) 5 (23.8) 1 (5.0) 
Discontinued study, n (%) 1 (50.0) 2 (100.0) 2 (66.7) 4 (19.0) 5 (25.0) 14 (93.3) 
Withdrew consent 2 (9.5) 1 (5.0) 2 (13.3) 
Lost to follow-up 1 (33.3) 
Death 1 (50.0) 2 (100.0) 1 (4.8) 3 (15.0) 9 (60.0) 
Other 1 (33.3) 1 (4.8) 1 (5.0) 3 (20.0) 
Relatlimab monotherapy (240 mg; part B)Nivolumab plus relatlimab (240 mg/160 mg; part D)
CLL (n = 2)DLBCL (n = 2)IL (n = 4)HL (n = 3)Anti–PD-(L)1–naive HL 
(n = 21)
Anti–PD-(L)1–progressed HL 
(n = 20)
DLBCL (n = 15)
Ongoing treatment, n (%) 
Discontinued treatment, n (%) 2 (100.0) 2 (100.0) 4 (100.0) 3 (100.0) 21 (100.0) 20 (100.0) 15 (100.0) 
Disease progression 1 (50.0) 2 (100.0) 4 (100.0) 2 (66.7) 2 (9.5) 12 (60.0) 14 (93.3) 
Study drug toxicity 3 (14.3) 3 (15.0) 
Patient request 1 (4.8) 1 (6.7) 
Withdrew consent 1 (4.8) 1 (5.0) 
Maximum clinical benefit  5 (23.8)  1 (5.0)§  
No longer met study criteria 1 (5.0) 
Completed treatment per protocol 4 (19.0) 1 (5.0) 
Other 1 (50.0) 1 (33.3) 5 (23.8) 1 (5.0) 
Discontinued study, n (%) 1 (50.0) 2 (100.0) 2 (66.7) 4 (19.0) 5 (25.0) 14 (93.3) 
Withdrew consent 2 (9.5) 1 (5.0) 2 (13.3) 
Lost to follow-up 1 (33.3) 
Death 1 (50.0) 2 (100.0) 1 (4.8) 3 (15.0) 9 (60.0) 
Other 1 (33.3) 1 (4.8) 1 (5.0) 3 (20.0) 

BOR, best overall response; SD, stable disease.

Most were classic HL; 2 patients with nodular lymphocyte–predominant HL were included in part D (1 in PD-(L)1–progressed and 1 in PD-(L)1–naive).

Maximum clinical benefit was per investigator assessment.

BOR of PR (3) and SD (2) was observed among 5 patients with anti–PD-(L)1–naive HL with maximum clinical benefit.

§

BOR of SD (1) was observed among 1 patient with anti–PD-(L)1–progressed HL with maximum clinical benefit.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal