Theme 5 consensus recommendations
Defining allo-HSCT eligibility in the LATAM region . | Strength of recommendation,∗ median score (mean score) . | Level of consensus† . |
---|---|---|
Q14. What are the key clinical criteria for identifying eligible candidates for allo-HSCT in the LATAM region? Consensus statement Evaluation for allo-HSCT is recommended for all patients with intermediate-2 or high-risk MF according to the DIPSS Plus‡ criteria; patient preferences and treatment goals should be considered during the decision-making process, alongside the specific capabilities of the treatment center. Key patient-related clinical criteria include:
| 9 (8.61) | n/N = 23/23 (100%) |
Q15. How should JAKi treatment be managed before transplantation? Consensus statement JAKi treatment is recommended before transplantation for spleen and symptom control to improve transplant outcome. According to institutional transplant team policy, JAKi therapy may continue:
| 9 (8.72) | n/N = 25/25 (100%) |
Defining allo-HSCT eligibility in the LATAM region . | Strength of recommendation,∗ median score (mean score) . | Level of consensus† . |
---|---|---|
Q14. What are the key clinical criteria for identifying eligible candidates for allo-HSCT in the LATAM region? Consensus statement Evaluation for allo-HSCT is recommended for all patients with intermediate-2 or high-risk MF according to the DIPSS Plus‡ criteria; patient preferences and treatment goals should be considered during the decision-making process, alongside the specific capabilities of the treatment center. Key patient-related clinical criteria include:
| 9 (8.61) | n/N = 23/23 (100%) |
Q15. How should JAKi treatment be managed before transplantation? Consensus statement JAKi treatment is recommended before transplantation for spleen and symptom control to improve transplant outcome. According to institutional transplant team policy, JAKi therapy may continue:
| 9 (8.72) | n/N = 25/25 (100%) |
Median score on a 1 to 9 scale (mean score in parentheses).
Percentage of votes with 7 to 9 on a 9-point scale. Participants were provided with the voting option “Not Applicable” for recommendations outside their area expertise.
Where DIPSS Plus is not available, other prognostic scores may be used (eg, DIPSS).