Table 3.

Sensitivity analyses of the 5-y PFS with pola-R-CHP in DLBCL (compared with R-CHOP)

Cost-effectivenessProportion of simulations that pola-R-CHP is cost effective at various WTP thresholds
5-y PFS with pola-R-CHPLife-years gainedEffectiveness (QALYs)Incremental effectivenessCost (2021 US dollars)Incremental costICER$50 000$100 000$150 000
60% −0.21 9.40 −1.49 446 006 $103 173 Dominated 21% 26% 33% 
65% 0.15 11.25 0.36 432 982 $90 149 250 413 36% 44% 49% 
70% 0.69 11.82 0.93 417 600 $70 682 80 394 49% 57% 61% 
75% 1.23 12.40 1.51 377 192 $45 784 30 321 57% 67% 72% 
Cost-effectivenessProportion of simulations that pola-R-CHP is cost effective at various WTP thresholds
5-y PFS with pola-R-CHPLife-years gainedEffectiveness (QALYs)Incremental effectivenessCost (2021 US dollars)Incremental costICER$50 000$100 000$150 000
60% −0.21 9.40 −1.49 446 006 $103 173 Dominated 21% 26% 33% 
65% 0.15 11.25 0.36 432 982 $90 149 250 413 36% 44% 49% 
70% 0.69 11.82 0.93 417 600 $70 682 80 394 49% 57% 61% 
75% 1.23 12.40 1.51 377 192 $45 784 30 321 57% 67% 72% 

In this table, the 5-year PFS is varied from 60% to 75%, and the clinical outcomes (OS), effectiveness (life-years gained and QALY), and total cost related to DLBCL are displayed.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal