Table 2.

Detailed analysis of outcomes and cost-effectiveness of R-CHOP and pola-R-CHP

Treatment2- and 5-Year outcomesCost-effectivenessIncremental
cost
ICER ($/QALY)
2-y OS2-y PFS5-y OS5-y PFSLife-yearsEffectiveness (QALYs)Incremental effectivenessCost (2021 US dollars)
R-CHOP 88.4% 70.2% 77.4% 62.7% 11.37 10.89 – 342 833 –  
Base-case (pola-R-CHP and R-CHOP have same 2- to 5-year relapse rates) 
pola-R-CHP 88.6% 76.6% 81.1% 69.6% 11.89 11.80 0.91 419 769 76 936 84 308 
Scenario 2 (pola-R-CHP decreases risk of relapse between 2 and 5 y) 
pola-R-CHP 88.6% 76.6% 84.3% 75.1% 12.60 12.40 1.51 377 192 45 784 30 321 
Scenario 3: pola-R-CHP merely delays inevitable relapses after 2 y 
pola-R-CHP 88.6% 76.6% 78.2% 62.6% 11.47 11.06 0.17 514 833 172 000 1 011 765 
Treatment2- and 5-Year outcomesCost-effectivenessIncremental
cost
ICER ($/QALY)
2-y OS2-y PFS5-y OS5-y PFSLife-yearsEffectiveness (QALYs)Incremental effectivenessCost (2021 US dollars)
R-CHOP 88.4% 70.2% 77.4% 62.7% 11.37 10.89 – 342 833 –  
Base-case (pola-R-CHP and R-CHOP have same 2- to 5-year relapse rates) 
pola-R-CHP 88.6% 76.6% 81.1% 69.6% 11.89 11.80 0.91 419 769 76 936 84 308 
Scenario 2 (pola-R-CHP decreases risk of relapse between 2 and 5 y) 
pola-R-CHP 88.6% 76.6% 84.3% 75.1% 12.60 12.40 1.51 377 192 45 784 30 321 
Scenario 3: pola-R-CHP merely delays inevitable relapses after 2 y 
pola-R-CHP 88.6% 76.6% 78.2% 62.6% 11.47 11.06 0.17 514 833 172 000 1 011 765 

First, the clinical outcomes (2- and 5-year OS and PFS) are displayed. Then effectiveness is displayed as life-years as well as QALYs. The costs displayed are the total lifetime costs related to DLBCL treatment for each strategy.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal