Table 4.

Sensitivity analyses of the 5-y EFS with second-line CART in primary refractory/early relapse patients compared with SOC

5-y EFS with second-line CAR-TCost-effectivenessProportion of simulations that second-line CAR-T is cost-effective at various WTP thresholds
Life-years gainedEffectiveness (QALYs)Incremental effectivenessCost (2021 USD)Incremental costICER$50 000$100 000$150 000
20% 1.02 3.99 1.39 $832 497 $324 463 $233 967 4% 19% 31% 
25% 2.12 4.47 1.87 $812 288 $304 254 $162 778 7% 26% 47% 
30% 2.65 4.95 2.35 $792 068 $284 033 $121 024 15% 44% 61% 
35% 3.29 5.42 2.82 $771 838 $263 804 $93 547 34% 57% 73% 
40% 3.88 5.90 3.29 $751 602 $243 568 $73 968 41% 72% 84% 
5-y EFS with second-line CAR-TCost-effectivenessProportion of simulations that second-line CAR-T is cost-effective at various WTP thresholds
Life-years gainedEffectiveness (QALYs)Incremental effectivenessCost (2021 USD)Incremental costICER$50 000$100 000$150 000
20% 1.02 3.99 1.39 $832 497 $324 463 $233 967 4% 19% 31% 
25% 2.12 4.47 1.87 $812 288 $304 254 $162 778 7% 26% 47% 
30% 2.65 4.95 2.35 $792 068 $284 033 $121 024 15% 44% 61% 
35% 3.29 5.42 2.82 $771 838 $263 804 $93 547 34% 57% 73% 
40% 3.88 5.90 3.29 $751 602 $243 568 $73 968 41% 72% 84% 

In this table, the 5-year EFS is varied from 20% to 40%, and the clinical outcomes (OS), effectiveness (life-years gained and QALY), and total cost related to RR-DLBCL are displayed. USD, US dollars.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal