Scenario analysis results
| Scenario . | Total cost . | Total QALY . | ICER . | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LTP . | ODT . | LTP . | ODT . | ||
| Base case | £1 718 847 | £2 550 053 | 11.30 | 5.16 | –£135 311 | 
| Baseline ABR, low (11) | £1 670 870 | £1 058 395 | 11.42 | 8.86 | £239 150 | 
| Baseline ABR, high (39.6) | £1 759 395 | £3 810 809 | 11.20 | 2.04 | –£223 864 | 
| Lower bound bleed resources used∗ | £1 709 928 | £2 255 026 | 11.30 | 5.16 | –£88 736 | 
| Upper bound bleed resources used† | £1 730 338 | £2 900 505 | 11.30 | 5.16 | –£190 490 | 
| Scenario . | Total cost . | Total QALY . | ICER . | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LTP . | ODT . | LTP . | ODT . | ||
| Base case | £1 718 847 | £2 550 053 | 11.30 | 5.16 | –£135 311 | 
| Baseline ABR, low (11) | £1 670 870 | £1 058 395 | 11.42 | 8.86 | £239 150 | 
| Baseline ABR, high (39.6) | £1 759 395 | £3 810 809 | 11.20 | 2.04 | –£223 864 | 
| Lower bound bleed resources used∗ | £1 709 928 | £2 255 026 | 11.30 | 5.16 | –£88 736 | 
| Upper bound bleed resources used† | £1 730 338 | £2 900 505 | 11.30 | 5.16 | –£190 490 |