Scenario analysis results
Scenario . | Total cost . | Total QALY . | ICER . | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
LTP . | ODT . | LTP . | ODT . | ||
Base case | £1 718 847 | £2 550 053 | 11.30 | 5.16 | –£135 311 |
Baseline ABR, low (11) | £1 670 870 | £1 058 395 | 11.42 | 8.86 | £239 150 |
Baseline ABR, high (39.6) | £1 759 395 | £3 810 809 | 11.20 | 2.04 | –£223 864 |
Lower bound bleed resources used∗ | £1 709 928 | £2 255 026 | 11.30 | 5.16 | –£88 736 |
Upper bound bleed resources used† | £1 730 338 | £2 900 505 | 11.30 | 5.16 | –£190 490 |
Scenario . | Total cost . | Total QALY . | ICER . | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
LTP . | ODT . | LTP . | ODT . | ||
Base case | £1 718 847 | £2 550 053 | 11.30 | 5.16 | –£135 311 |
Baseline ABR, low (11) | £1 670 870 | £1 058 395 | 11.42 | 8.86 | £239 150 |
Baseline ABR, high (39.6) | £1 759 395 | £3 810 809 | 11.20 | 2.04 | –£223 864 |
Lower bound bleed resources used∗ | £1 709 928 | £2 255 026 | 11.30 | 5.16 | –£88 736 |
Upper bound bleed resources used† | £1 730 338 | £2 900 505 | 11.30 | 5.16 | –£190 490 |