Table 2.

Key phase 3 randomized studies for Ph+ ALL

Group/study/yearsTKIRandomization questionNAge in years, median (range)CR (%)Early mortality (%)Molecular response (%)alloHCT, CR1 (%)RFS/EFS (%)OS (%)
GRAALL(SAKK)
GRAAPH-2005
NCT00327678
2006-2011 
IM Induction intensity: low (vincristine, dex) vs high (hyper-CVAD) 266
135 low (A)
133 high (B) 
47 (18-59)
45 (18-59)
45 (21-59) 
94.8
98.5
91.0
p = 0.006 
5.6 (day 60)
2.2
9.0
p = 0.017 
25.8 (MR4, C2)
28.6
22.6
p = 0.35 
63.3
61.6
65.3
p = 0.53 
37.1 (5-yr EFS)
42.2 (5-yr EFS)
32.1 (5-yr EFS)
p = 0.13 
45.6 (5 yr)
48.3 (5 yr)
43.0 (5 yr)
p = 0.37 
GRAALL(SAKK)
GRAAPH-2014
NCT02611492
2016-2019 
NIL Consolidation intensity: low (HD-MTX) vs high (HiDAC, HD-MTX) 156
79 low (B)
77 high (A) 
47 (IQR 39-54)
47 (IQR 39-54)
49 (IQR 39-54) 
94.2
94.9
93.4
p = 0.74 
3.2 (day 60)
2.5
3.9
p = 0.68 
26.4 (MR4, C4)
24.1
28.9
p = 0.59 
60.0
59.5
60.5
p = 0.97 
-
58.5 (4-yr RFS)
76.2 (4-yr RFS)
p = 0.029 
-
73.4 (4 yr)
79.4 (4 yr)
p = 0.27 
China
CCCG-ALL2015
ChiCTR-IPR-14005706
2015-2018 
IM vs DAS IM vs DAS with chemo 189
97 IM
92 DAS 
7.8 (IQR 5-11)
-
96.8
94.8
98.9
p = 0.21 
1 death (IM arm) None -
48.9 (4-yr EFS)
71.0 (4-yr EFS)
p = 0.005 
-
69.2 (4-yr)
88.4 (4-yr)
p = 0.04 
Global
PhALLCON
NCT03589326
2018-2022 
IM vs PON IM vs PON with low-intensity chemo 245
81 IM
163 PON 
54 (19-82)
52 (19-75)
54 (19-82) 
-
 
(MR4, C9)
44.9
62.1
 
32.7
37.0
30.5 
-
Med EFS 29 mos
Med EFS NR
(HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.39-1.1) 
-
Med OS NR
Med OS NR
(HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.38-1.5) 
Group/study/yearsTKIRandomization questionNAge in years, median (range)CR (%)Early mortality (%)Molecular response (%)alloHCT, CR1 (%)RFS/EFS (%)OS (%)
GRAALL(SAKK)
GRAAPH-2005
NCT00327678
2006-2011 
IM Induction intensity: low (vincristine, dex) vs high (hyper-CVAD) 266
135 low (A)
133 high (B) 
47 (18-59)
45 (18-59)
45 (21-59) 
94.8
98.5
91.0
p = 0.006 
5.6 (day 60)
2.2
9.0
p = 0.017 
25.8 (MR4, C2)
28.6
22.6
p = 0.35 
63.3
61.6
65.3
p = 0.53 
37.1 (5-yr EFS)
42.2 (5-yr EFS)
32.1 (5-yr EFS)
p = 0.13 
45.6 (5 yr)
48.3 (5 yr)
43.0 (5 yr)
p = 0.37 
GRAALL(SAKK)
GRAAPH-2014
NCT02611492
2016-2019 
NIL Consolidation intensity: low (HD-MTX) vs high (HiDAC, HD-MTX) 156
79 low (B)
77 high (A) 
47 (IQR 39-54)
47 (IQR 39-54)
49 (IQR 39-54) 
94.2
94.9
93.4
p = 0.74 
3.2 (day 60)
2.5
3.9
p = 0.68 
26.4 (MR4, C4)
24.1
28.9
p = 0.59 
60.0
59.5
60.5
p = 0.97 
-
58.5 (4-yr RFS)
76.2 (4-yr RFS)
p = 0.029 
-
73.4 (4 yr)
79.4 (4 yr)
p = 0.27 
China
CCCG-ALL2015
ChiCTR-IPR-14005706
2015-2018 
IM vs DAS IM vs DAS with chemo 189
97 IM
92 DAS 
7.8 (IQR 5-11)
-
96.8
94.8
98.9
p = 0.21 
1 death (IM arm) None -
48.9 (4-yr EFS)
71.0 (4-yr EFS)
p = 0.005 
-
69.2 (4-yr)
88.4 (4-yr)
p = 0.04 
Global
PhALLCON
NCT03589326
2018-2022 
IM vs PON IM vs PON with low-intensity chemo 245
81 IM
163 PON 
54 (19-82)
52 (19-75)
54 (19-82) 
-
 
(MR4, C9)
44.9
62.1
 
32.7
37.0
30.5 
-
Med EFS 29 mos
Med EFS NR
(HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.39-1.1) 
-
Med OS NR
Med OS NR
(HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.38-1.5) 

Chemo, chemotherapy; CR, complete remission; CMR, complete molecular remission; DAS, dasatinib; dex, dexamethasone; EFS, event-free survival; GRAALL, Group for Research on Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia; HD-MTX, high-dose methotrexate; HiDAC, high-dose ara-c; HR, hazard ratio; IM, imatinib; med, median; mos, months; MR, molecular response; NIL, nilotinib; NR, not reached; OS, overall survival; PON, ponatinib; RFS, relapse-free survival; SAKK (France, Belgium, and Switzerland); TKI, tyrosine kinase inhibitor; yr, year.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal