Table 1.

Treatment response assessed by IRC, in ITT population, and duration of response

Time, n (%)Ide-cel (n = 254)SRs (n = 132)
ORR    
Number of patients with response, n 181 56 
Percentage of patients with response, % (95% CI)  71 (66-77) 42 (34-51) 
Common rate difference (95% CI)  29 (19-39) 
Common odds ratio  3.44 (2.20-5.40) 
CR rate§    
Number of patients with a CR, n 111 
Percentage of patients with CR, % (95% CI)  44 (38-50) 5 (2-9) 
Common rate difference (95% CI)  38 (31-45) 
CR at 24 mo, n (%) 50 (20) 5 (4) 
BOR, n (%)   
sCR 103 (41) 6 (5) 
CR 8 (3) 1 (1) 
VGPR 45 (18) 15 (11) 
PR 25 (10) 34 (26) 
MR 4 (2) 8 (6) 
SD 31 (12) 49 (37) 
PD 24 (9) 10 (8) 
Not evaluable/not done 14 (6) 9 (7) 
Median time from randomization to response, mo (range)||  2.8 (1.1-13.0) 2.1 (0.8-9.4) 
Median DOR, mo (95% CI),#  16.6 (12.1-19.6) 9.7 (5.5-16.1) 
DOR rate at 18 mo, % (SE)∗∗  46 (3.8) 28 (6.4) 
MRD-negative CR rate, n/N (%)††  57/163 (35) 1/54 (2) 
95% CI 27.6-42.3 0.0-5.4 
Time, n (%)Ide-cel (n = 254)SRs (n = 132)
ORR    
Number of patients with response, n 181 56 
Percentage of patients with response, % (95% CI)  71 (66-77) 42 (34-51) 
Common rate difference (95% CI)  29 (19-39) 
Common odds ratio  3.44 (2.20-5.40) 
CR rate§    
Number of patients with a CR, n 111 
Percentage of patients with CR, % (95% CI)  44 (38-50) 5 (2-9) 
Common rate difference (95% CI)  38 (31-45) 
CR at 24 mo, n (%) 50 (20) 5 (4) 
BOR, n (%)   
sCR 103 (41) 6 (5) 
CR 8 (3) 1 (1) 
VGPR 45 (18) 15 (11) 
PR 25 (10) 34 (26) 
MR 4 (2) 8 (6) 
SD 31 (12) 49 (37) 
PD 24 (9) 10 (8) 
Not evaluable/not done 14 (6) 9 (7) 
Median time from randomization to response, mo (range)||  2.8 (1.1-13.0) 2.1 (0.8-9.4) 
Median DOR, mo (95% CI),#  16.6 (12.1-19.6) 9.7 (5.5-16.1) 
DOR rate at 18 mo, % (SE)∗∗  46 (3.8) 28 (6.4) 
MRD-negative CR rate, n/N (%)††  57/163 (35) 1/54 (2) 
95% CI 27.6-42.3 0.0-5.4 

Per IMWG uniform response criteria and as specified by the protocol. 95% CI was calculated using 2-sided Wald interval. Definitions of response and disease progression were modified from IMWG criteria.24 An overall response was defined as a PR or better. CR was defined as a complete response or a stringent complete response. An sCR was defined as a CR with a normal serum-free light-chain ratio and an absence of clonal plasma cells according to the IMWG response criteria.24 Percentages may not total 100 because of rounding.

BOR, best overall response; DOR, duration of response; IMWG, International Myeloma Working Group; MR, minimal response; PR, partial response; sCR, stringent CR; SD, stable disease; SE, standard error; VGPR, very good partial response.

Patients with PR or better.

CI is a 2-sided Wald CI.

Based on Mantel-Haenszel estimate.

§

Patients with CR or sCR.

||

In patients treated with ide-cel (n = 225), median time from ide-cel infusion to response was 1.0 months (range, 0.9-10.4).

Based on KM estimation per IRC based on IMWG criteria.

#

In patients with a response.

∗∗

Based on the Greenwood formula.

††

Defined as ≥1 negative MRD value within 3 months before achieving ≥CR until PD or death. MRD was assessed by next-generation sequencing at a sensitivity of 10−5 per IMWG uniform response criteria and as specified by the protocol. 95% CI was calculated using 2-sided Wald interval. MRD-negative CR rate is shown in patients who had evaluable samples (163 in the ide-cel arm and 54 in the standard regimens arm).

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal