Table 3.

Comparison of baseline characteristics of patients who maintained aMCD and transformed to iMCD

Patients who maintained aMCDPatients who transformed to iMCDP value
Sex, male, n (%) 55 (50.9%) 5 (8.3%) .122 
Age at diagnosis of aMCD, y 43.2 ± 15.8 48.5 ± 21.3 .436 
Involvement of both sides of the diaphragm, n (%) 24 (22.2%) 3 (50.0%) .119 
HV subtype, n (%) 53 (59.6%) 2 (50.0%) .704 
Receiving treatment for aMCD, n (%) 40 (37.0%) 3 (50.0%) .524 
Patients who maintained aMCDPatients who transformed to iMCDP value
Sex, male, n (%) 55 (50.9%) 5 (8.3%) .122 
Age at diagnosis of aMCD, y 43.2 ± 15.8 48.5 ± 21.3 .436 
Involvement of both sides of the diaphragm, n (%) 24 (22.2%) 3 (50.0%) .119 
HV subtype, n (%) 53 (59.6%) 2 (50.0%) .704 
Receiving treatment for aMCD, n (%) 40 (37.0%) 3 (50.0%) .524 
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal