Table 2.

Disease characteristics

CharacteristicN = 152
FLT3-ITD  134 (88%) 
FLT3-TKD  23 (16%) 
Evolution of FLT3 mutation  
Present at diagnosis and relapse 131 (86%) 
Emergent upon relapse 21 (14%) 
Cytogenetic/FISH abnormalities  
Normal karyotype 89 (62%) 
+8 16 (11%) 
KMT2A rearrangement 4 (2.7%) 
MECOM rearrangement 3 (2.1%) 
Complex karyotype 5 (3.5%) 
Other adverse, noncomplex (del5q, −7, del17p) 8 (5.6%) 
Failed or missing 
MRC cytogenetic risk  
Intermediate 134 (88%) 
Adverse 18 (12%) 
NPM1 mutation 52 (34%) 
Molecular mutations (present in >5%)  
DNMT3A 44 (35%) 
RUNX1 25 (20%) 
TET2 15 (12%) 
SRSF2 13 (10%) 
IDH2 13 (10%) 
ASXL1 12 (9.6%) 
WT1 12 (9.6%) 
NRAS 10 (8.0%) 
SF3B1 9 (7.2%) 
IDH1 8 (6.4%) 
Missing 27 
ELN 2022 risk classification  
Favorable 5 (3.3%) 
Intermediate 96 (64%) 
Adverse 50 (33%) 
CharacteristicN = 152
FLT3-ITD  134 (88%) 
FLT3-TKD  23 (16%) 
Evolution of FLT3 mutation  
Present at diagnosis and relapse 131 (86%) 
Emergent upon relapse 21 (14%) 
Cytogenetic/FISH abnormalities  
Normal karyotype 89 (62%) 
+8 16 (11%) 
KMT2A rearrangement 4 (2.7%) 
MECOM rearrangement 3 (2.1%) 
Complex karyotype 5 (3.5%) 
Other adverse, noncomplex (del5q, −7, del17p) 8 (5.6%) 
Failed or missing 
MRC cytogenetic risk  
Intermediate 134 (88%) 
Adverse 18 (12%) 
NPM1 mutation 52 (34%) 
Molecular mutations (present in >5%)  
DNMT3A 44 (35%) 
RUNX1 25 (20%) 
TET2 15 (12%) 
SRSF2 13 (10%) 
IDH2 13 (10%) 
ASXL1 12 (9.6%) 
WT1 12 (9.6%) 
NRAS 10 (8.0%) 
SF3B1 9 (7.2%) 
IDH1 8 (6.4%) 
Missing 27 
ELN 2022 risk classification  
Favorable 5 (3.3%) 
Intermediate 96 (64%) 
Adverse 50 (33%) 

FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridization; MRC, Medical Research Council.

Five patients had both FLT3-ITD and FLT3-TKD

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal