Table 1.

Patient demographics

Patient no.SexAge at diagnosis, yGene rearrangementChromosome karyotypingMutation analysis (VAF or allele ratio)Chemotherapy or conditioning regimen Donor type (HLA matching, HLA-A, -B, -C,
-DRB1, and -DQB1)
Disease status at HSCTRelapse after HSCT/dF/UOutcomeCause of death
P1 65 NUP98::HMGB3 47,XY,inv(9)(p11q13),+21[20] FLT3-ITD (0.18) Dec    1 y 2 mo Death Leukemia 
P2 74 NUP98::NSD1 47,XY,+8[17]/46,XY,del(5)(q22q35)[3] FLT3-ITD (1.95)
FLT3 (9.2%)
DNMT3A (42.4%) 
Dec, Aza + Ven    2 mo Death Leukemia 
P3 57 NUP98::DDX10 46,XX,inv(11)(p15q22)[9]/46,XX[12] None Bu + Flu + ATG MUD (10/10) CR No 11 mo Death COVID-19 
P4 33 NUP98::TOP1 46,XX,del(9)(q13q31),t(11;20)(p15;q11)[17]/46,idem,del(7)(q32)[3]/46,XX[2] RAD21 (40.3%) Bu + Cy + ATG MUD (9/10) CR No 3 y 10 mo Alive  
P5 23 NUP98::NSD1 46,XY[20] FLT3-ITD (0.72)
RUNX1 (46.7%) 
Flu + Cy + TBI Haplo CR No 4 y 5 mo Alive  
P6 34 NUP98::NSD1 46,XY[20] FLT3-ITD (0.75) Bu + Cy + ATG MUD (10/10) CR No 4 y 3 mo Alive  
P7 20 NUP98::HOXA9 46,XX,t(7;11)(p15;p15)[20] NRAS (15.3%) Flu + Cy + TBI Haplo CR Yes/1 y 4 y 5 mo Alive after 2nd
HSCT 
 
P8 58 NUP98::HOXC13 46,XX,t(11;12)(p15;q13)[20] FLT3-ITD (0.26)
PTPN11 (6.4%)
NRAS (6.3%) 
Bu + Flu + ATG MUD (10/10) CR No 2 y 4 mo F/U lost  
P9 37 NUP98::PHF23 46,XY,der(16)t(3;16)(q21;p13.1),del(17)(p11.2)[20] TP53 (WGD)
CREBBP (WGD)
AXIN1 (WGD)
NRAS (27.3%)
NRAS (12.3%) 
Bu + Cy + ATG MUD (10/10) CR No 1 y 5 mo Alive  
P10 26 NUP98::NSD1 46,XX,t(5;12)(q35;q24.1)?c[20] FLT3-ITD (0.39)
WT1 (46.5%) 
Bu + Cy + ATG MSD CR No 2 y 7 mo Alive  
Patient no.SexAge at diagnosis, yGene rearrangementChromosome karyotypingMutation analysis (VAF or allele ratio)Chemotherapy or conditioning regimen Donor type (HLA matching, HLA-A, -B, -C,
-DRB1, and -DQB1)
Disease status at HSCTRelapse after HSCT/dF/UOutcomeCause of death
P1 65 NUP98::HMGB3 47,XY,inv(9)(p11q13),+21[20] FLT3-ITD (0.18) Dec    1 y 2 mo Death Leukemia 
P2 74 NUP98::NSD1 47,XY,+8[17]/46,XY,del(5)(q22q35)[3] FLT3-ITD (1.95)
FLT3 (9.2%)
DNMT3A (42.4%) 
Dec, Aza + Ven    2 mo Death Leukemia 
P3 57 NUP98::DDX10 46,XX,inv(11)(p15q22)[9]/46,XX[12] None Bu + Flu + ATG MUD (10/10) CR No 11 mo Death COVID-19 
P4 33 NUP98::TOP1 46,XX,del(9)(q13q31),t(11;20)(p15;q11)[17]/46,idem,del(7)(q32)[3]/46,XX[2] RAD21 (40.3%) Bu + Cy + ATG MUD (9/10) CR No 3 y 10 mo Alive  
P5 23 NUP98::NSD1 46,XY[20] FLT3-ITD (0.72)
RUNX1 (46.7%) 
Flu + Cy + TBI Haplo CR No 4 y 5 mo Alive  
P6 34 NUP98::NSD1 46,XY[20] FLT3-ITD (0.75) Bu + Cy + ATG MUD (10/10) CR No 4 y 3 mo Alive  
P7 20 NUP98::HOXA9 46,XX,t(7;11)(p15;p15)[20] NRAS (15.3%) Flu + Cy + TBI Haplo CR Yes/1 y 4 y 5 mo Alive after 2nd
HSCT 
 
P8 58 NUP98::HOXC13 46,XX,t(11;12)(p15;q13)[20] FLT3-ITD (0.26)
PTPN11 (6.4%)
NRAS (6.3%) 
Bu + Flu + ATG MUD (10/10) CR No 2 y 4 mo F/U lost  
P9 37 NUP98::PHF23 46,XY,der(16)t(3;16)(q21;p13.1),del(17)(p11.2)[20] TP53 (WGD)
CREBBP (WGD)
AXIN1 (WGD)
NRAS (27.3%)
NRAS (12.3%) 
Bu + Cy + ATG MUD (10/10) CR No 1 y 5 mo Alive  
P10 26 NUP98::NSD1 46,XX,t(5;12)(q35;q24.1)?c[20] FLT3-ITD (0.39)
WT1 (46.5%) 
Bu + Cy + ATG MSD CR No 2 y 7 mo Alive  

ATG, antithymocyte globulin; Aza, azacitidine; Bu, busulfan; Cy, cyclophosphamide; Dec, decitabine; F, female; F/U, follow-up; Flu, fludarabine; Haplo, haploidentical donor; M, male; MSD, matched sibling donor; MUD, matched unrelated donor; TBI, total body irradiation; VAF, variant allele frequency; Ven, venetoclax; WGD, whole-gene deletion.

VAF (%) was calculated from next-generation sequencing as a percentage by dividing the number of variant allele reads at each position by the total number of reads at that position. FLT3-ITD allele ratio was calculated from fragment analysis as the ratio of the mutant product's peak height to the wild-type product's peak height.

We presented chemotherapy regimens for individuals who had not undergone transplantation (P1 and P2) and conditioning regimens for the remaining patients who had undergone HSCT.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal