Table 2.

Comparison of ASH CPGs and other forms of ASH clinical advice

Diverse stakeholder representation including patientsCOI managementIdentification and prioritization of PICO questionsSystematic reviews of the evidenceDevelopment of recommendations using GRADE or another structured frameworkPublic review and commentaryPeer reviewMain type of recommendationTransparency and concordance with best available evidenceTime to developCost to develop
ASH CPGs Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Formal High Mo to y High 
Other forms of ASH clinical advice  Usually not Varies Usually not Usually not Usually not Usually not Varies Informal Lower Wk to mo Low to moderate 
Diverse stakeholder representation including patientsCOI managementIdentification and prioritization of PICO questionsSystematic reviews of the evidenceDevelopment of recommendations using GRADE or another structured frameworkPublic review and commentaryPeer reviewMain type of recommendationTransparency and concordance with best available evidenceTime to developCost to develop
ASH CPGs Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Formal High Mo to y High 
Other forms of ASH clinical advice  Usually not Varies Usually not Usually not Usually not Usually not Varies Informal Lower Wk to mo Low to moderate 

PICO, patient, intervention, comparison, outcome.

Includes but not limited to How I Treat articles, webinars, FAQs, ASH annual meeting education sessions, the ASH Self-Assessment Program, and the Hematology Review Series.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal