Table 2.

Multivariable analysis incorporating the total number of ctDNA mutations in 6 significant genes, clinical factors, IGH rearrangements, del(17p), and plasma DNA concentration

VariableCoefficientHR95% lower CI95% upper CIP valueRRMM-PI score
No. of ctDNA mutations, n ≥ 2 1.2 3.5 2.0 6.0 9.5 × 10−6 
No. of ctDNA mutations, n = 1 0.8 2.2 1.3 3.7 .0018 
t(11;14) (FISH) 0.7 2.0 1.2 3.3 .0049 
No. of prior regimens, n ≥ 3 1.0 2.8 1.6 4.8 3.3 × 10−4 
No. of prior regimens, n = 2 0.4 1.5 0.8 2.8 .17 
Plasma DNA concentration: high 0.5 1.7 1.1 2.6 .019 
VariableCoefficientHR95% lower CI95% upper CIP valueRRMM-PI score
No. of ctDNA mutations, n ≥ 2 1.2 3.5 2.0 6.0 9.5 × 10−6 
No. of ctDNA mutations, n = 1 0.8 2.2 1.3 3.7 .0018 
t(11;14) (FISH) 0.7 2.0 1.2 3.3 .0049 
No. of prior regimens, n ≥ 3 1.0 2.8 1.6 4.8 3.3 × 10−4 
No. of prior regimens, n = 2 0.4 1.5 0.8 2.8 .17 
Plasma DNA concentration: high 0.5 1.7 1.1 2.6 .019 

HRs for PFS evaluated by Cox PH model incorporating the total number of ctDNA mutations in the 6 prognostically significant genes and clinical factors (treatment indication and number of prior therapies), IGH rearrangements (by FISH), 17p deletion (by BMPC-seq), and plasma DNA concentration in 161 RRMM cases analyzed by both ctDNA-seq and BMPC-seq.

High and low plasma DNA concentration by a median split. Final Cox PH model after stepwise variable selection minimizing Akaike’s information criterion are shown.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal