Table 1.

Trials with upfront targeted or subset-specific therapy in adult Ph ALL

Study (reference)ALL subsetCombination treatmentAge (y)No.CR (%)CRD/
RFS (%)
OS (%)EFS (%)FUPAnnotations
Rituximab/ofatumumab (anti-CD20 antibody)           
MDACC27  CD20+ B-ALL Hyper-CVAD + R ×8 in cycles 1-4, ×4 in maintenance cycles 6, 18 
60 
68 100 70 75 — 3 y Better outcome vs no R patients (P < .001 for CRD, P = .003 for OS); outcome not improved by R in patients aged 60+ 
GMALL28  CD20+ B-ALL GMALL 07/2003 + R ×8 (SR), ×3 (HR) in induction/consolidation 15-55 117 94 64 75 — 3 y Better outcome vs no R patients (P < .009 for CRD), with better/faster MRD clearing (MRD < 0.01% 60% at day 21) 
GRAALL-200329  CD20+ B-ALL A: SOC
B: SOC + R ×16-18 during induction/consolidation 
40
(24-53) 
105
104 
94
92 
— 50
61 
43
55 
4 y Better outcome vs no R patients (P < .04 for EFS, P =. 02 for relapse incidence) 
UKALL 1430  CD20+/− B-ALL (29% Ph+A: SOC
B: SOC + R ×4 in induction 
25-65 288
289 
92
94 
— — 42
48 
3 y No overall benefit from R (P = .28), better outcome with R after MAC SCT (EFS 72% vs 50%, P = .03) 
MDACC31  CD20+/− B-ALL Hyper-CVAD + ofatumumab ×8 in induction/consolidation 41 (18-71) 46 CD20+
23 CD20 
93 — 66
70 
61
65 
4 y CD20+: EFS and OS with R 43% (P = .119) and 48% (P = .123);
CD20-: EFS and OS with R 50% (P = .89) and 62% (P = .61) 
Blinatumomab           
GIMEMA LAL 231732  CD19+ B-ALL SOC + blinatumomab ×2 in consolidation 18-65 146 90 56-87 65-91 48-85 1.5 y 95% MRD negative after blinatumomab I (P = .001); OS by age (P = .0009) and DFS/EFS by Ph-like (P = .006) and MRD (P = .0002) 
GRAALL-2014- QUEST33  CD19+ B-ALL (high risk) SOC + blinatumomab ×5 in consolidation/ maintenance 35 (18-60) 95 NR 69-90 92 — 1.5 y 74% MRD negative after blinatumomab; DFS by high or very high risk class (P = .018) 
MDACC34  B-ALL Hyper-CVAD + blinatumomomab ×2 after induction and/or x2-4 after consolidation ± R/ofatumumab (CD20+) ± InO ×4 after consolidation 34
(17-59) 
58
(20 with InO) 
100 84 85 — 3 y 76% and 95% MRD negative after cycle 1 and overall, resp.; no relapse/death in InO-treated group (OS 100%) 
MDACC35  B-ALL Hyper-CVAD 4 cycles (50% dose reduction) + blinatumomab ×4 after induction and ×3 after consolidation + R/ofatumumab (CD20+) in induction/consolidation 37 (29-45) 38 100 73 81 — 3 y Amended to Hyper-CVAD 2 cycles (75% dose reduction) in HR patients; overall MRD negativity 97%; OS 88% no HR feature vs 76% any HR feature 
HOVON36  CD19+
B-ALL (37% Ph+) 
SOC + blinatumomab ×2 (prephase and after consolidation I) 53
(18-70) 
71 77 — 53
(Ph
68 (Ph2 y 53% and 91% MRD negative after blinatumomab I and II, resp.; EFS and OS 71% and 73% in patients ≤60 years 
GMALL0837  CD19+ B-ALL (MRD positive) Blinatumomab 1 cycle in MRD positive patients after consolidation I 18-35 63 all CR/MRD+ — — 71 3 y 55% molecular CR after blinatumomab I; subsequent SCT indicated in all patients 
ECOG-ACRIN (phase 3)38  CD19+ B-ALL (MRD negative) A: SOC consolidation
B: SOC consolidation + blinatumomab x4 
51 (30-70) 112
112 
81 — NR
71.4 
— 5 y CR rate on all study patients (n = 488); median OS arm B not reached (NR, >70% at 5 years) vs 71.4 months (P = .003) 
Nelarabine (T-specific nucleoside analog)           
MDACC39  T-ALL/LBL Hyper-CVAD + nelarabine after course 8 (×2) or 5 and 7 (×1 each) 30 (13-78) 81 NR — 57 52 5 y OS non-ETP 63% vs ETP 32% (P < .001); non-ETP: OS nelarabine 83% vs no nelarabine 38% (P = .003) 
UKALL 14 (Phase 3)40  T-ALL A: SOC
B: SOC + nelarabine ×1 after induction II 
25-65 75
69 
90
87 
— 61
65 
57
61 
3 y No benefit from single nelarabine course (3 doses), all P values not significant 
Study (reference)ALL subsetCombination treatmentAge (y)No.CR (%)CRD/
RFS (%)
OS (%)EFS (%)FUPAnnotations
Rituximab/ofatumumab (anti-CD20 antibody)           
MDACC27  CD20+ B-ALL Hyper-CVAD + R ×8 in cycles 1-4, ×4 in maintenance cycles 6, 18 
60 
68 100 70 75 — 3 y Better outcome vs no R patients (P < .001 for CRD, P = .003 for OS); outcome not improved by R in patients aged 60+ 
GMALL28  CD20+ B-ALL GMALL 07/2003 + R ×8 (SR), ×3 (HR) in induction/consolidation 15-55 117 94 64 75 — 3 y Better outcome vs no R patients (P < .009 for CRD), with better/faster MRD clearing (MRD < 0.01% 60% at day 21) 
GRAALL-200329  CD20+ B-ALL A: SOC
B: SOC + R ×16-18 during induction/consolidation 
40
(24-53) 
105
104 
94
92 
— 50
61 
43
55 
4 y Better outcome vs no R patients (P < .04 for EFS, P =. 02 for relapse incidence) 
UKALL 1430  CD20+/− B-ALL (29% Ph+A: SOC
B: SOC + R ×4 in induction 
25-65 288
289 
92
94 
— — 42
48 
3 y No overall benefit from R (P = .28), better outcome with R after MAC SCT (EFS 72% vs 50%, P = .03) 
MDACC31  CD20+/− B-ALL Hyper-CVAD + ofatumumab ×8 in induction/consolidation 41 (18-71) 46 CD20+
23 CD20 
93 — 66
70 
61
65 
4 y CD20+: EFS and OS with R 43% (P = .119) and 48% (P = .123);
CD20-: EFS and OS with R 50% (P = .89) and 62% (P = .61) 
Blinatumomab           
GIMEMA LAL 231732  CD19+ B-ALL SOC + blinatumomab ×2 in consolidation 18-65 146 90 56-87 65-91 48-85 1.5 y 95% MRD negative after blinatumomab I (P = .001); OS by age (P = .0009) and DFS/EFS by Ph-like (P = .006) and MRD (P = .0002) 
GRAALL-2014- QUEST33  CD19+ B-ALL (high risk) SOC + blinatumomab ×5 in consolidation/ maintenance 35 (18-60) 95 NR 69-90 92 — 1.5 y 74% MRD negative after blinatumomab; DFS by high or very high risk class (P = .018) 
MDACC34  B-ALL Hyper-CVAD + blinatumomomab ×2 after induction and/or x2-4 after consolidation ± R/ofatumumab (CD20+) ± InO ×4 after consolidation 34
(17-59) 
58
(20 with InO) 
100 84 85 — 3 y 76% and 95% MRD negative after cycle 1 and overall, resp.; no relapse/death in InO-treated group (OS 100%) 
MDACC35  B-ALL Hyper-CVAD 4 cycles (50% dose reduction) + blinatumomab ×4 after induction and ×3 after consolidation + R/ofatumumab (CD20+) in induction/consolidation 37 (29-45) 38 100 73 81 — 3 y Amended to Hyper-CVAD 2 cycles (75% dose reduction) in HR patients; overall MRD negativity 97%; OS 88% no HR feature vs 76% any HR feature 
HOVON36  CD19+
B-ALL (37% Ph+) 
SOC + blinatumomab ×2 (prephase and after consolidation I) 53
(18-70) 
71 77 — 53
(Ph
68 (Ph2 y 53% and 91% MRD negative after blinatumomab I and II, resp.; EFS and OS 71% and 73% in patients ≤60 years 
GMALL0837  CD19+ B-ALL (MRD positive) Blinatumomab 1 cycle in MRD positive patients after consolidation I 18-35 63 all CR/MRD+ — — 71 3 y 55% molecular CR after blinatumomab I; subsequent SCT indicated in all patients 
ECOG-ACRIN (phase 3)38  CD19+ B-ALL (MRD negative) A: SOC consolidation
B: SOC consolidation + blinatumomab x4 
51 (30-70) 112
112 
81 — NR
71.4 
— 5 y CR rate on all study patients (n = 488); median OS arm B not reached (NR, >70% at 5 years) vs 71.4 months (P = .003) 
Nelarabine (T-specific nucleoside analog)           
MDACC39  T-ALL/LBL Hyper-CVAD + nelarabine after course 8 (×2) or 5 and 7 (×1 each) 30 (13-78) 81 NR — 57 52 5 y OS non-ETP 63% vs ETP 32% (P < .001); non-ETP: OS nelarabine 83% vs no nelarabine 38% (P = .003) 
UKALL 14 (Phase 3)40  T-ALL A: SOC
B: SOC + nelarabine ×1 after induction II 
25-65 75
69 
90
87 
— 61
65 
57
61 
3 y No benefit from single nelarabine course (3 doses), all P values not significant 

A, B: study arms in randomized trials; CR, complete remission; CRD/RFS, CR duration/relapse-free survival; FUP, follow-up; GIMEMA, Gruppo Italiano Malattie Ematologiche dell’Adulto; GRAALL, Group for Research on Adult ALL; GMALL, German Multicenter Group for Adult ALL; HOVON, Hemato-Oncology Foundation for Adults in The Netherlands; InO, inotuzumab ozogamicin; LBL, lymphoblastic lymphoma; MAC SCT, myeloablative conditioned SCT; MDACC, MD Anderson Cancer Center; NR, not reported; R, rituximab; SOC, standard of care (chemotherapy).

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal