Table 4.

Multivariable logistic regression model of predictors of PF

EUR only analysis (N = 111)
βSEOR (95% CI)P value
ΔP variants 0.96 0.39 2.61 (1.29-6.1)  .01 
Sex −1.58 0.93 0.21 (0.03-1.18) .09 
Age −0.05 0.02 0.95 (0.91-0.99)  .02 
SOFA score  0.67 0.16 1.96 (1.49-2.87)§  <.0001 
EUR only analysis (N = 111)
βSEOR (95% CI)P value
ΔP variants 0.96 0.39 2.61 (1.29-6.1)  .01 
Sex −1.58 0.93 0.21 (0.03-1.18) .09 
Age −0.05 0.02 0.95 (0.91-0.99)  .02 
SOFA score  0.67 0.16 1.96 (1.49-2.87)§  <.0001 
Entire study analysis (N = 124)
βSEOR (95% CI)P value
ΔP variants 1.05 0.33 2.85 (1.58-5.90)  .002 
Sex −1.02 0.81 0.36 (0.07-1.72) .21 
Age −0.06 0.02 0.94 (0.90-0.98)  .005 
SOFA score  0.75 0.17 2.12 (1.59-3.16)§  <.0001 
Entire study analysis (N = 124)
βSEOR (95% CI)P value
ΔP variants 1.05 0.33 2.85 (1.58-5.90)  .002 
Sex −1.02 0.81 0.36 (0.07-1.72) .21 
Age −0.06 0.02 0.94 (0.90-0.98)  .005 
SOFA score  0.75 0.17 2.12 (1.59-3.16)§  <.0001 

CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; SE, standard error.

Per ΔP variant.

Per year of age.

Composite measure comprised of: PaO2, FiO2, mechanical ventilation status, platelet count, Glasgow Coma Scale, total bilirubin level, mean arterial pressure, and creatinine level.

§

Per one point increase in SOFA score.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal