Table 4.

Univariable analyses for PFS and OS

Patients (n)PFSOS
HR (95% CI)PNumber of eventsHR (95% CI)PNumber of events
Age (for 1 y increase in age)  1.04 (1.002-1.071) .04 55 1.06 (1.02-1.10) .003 44 
Age (over/ under 75 y) over (71) vs under (68) 1.71 (0.99-2.96) .051 55 1.94 (1.06-3.57) .03 44 
Rituximab Use With (54) vs without (85) 0.92 (0.53-1.6) .764 55 1.05 (0.56-1.93) .88 44 
Risk Group High (51) vs Low (88) 2.19 (1.28-3.73) .004 55 2.36 (1.35-4.27) .005 44 
Ki67 ≥ 30% At least 30% (45) vs <30% (41) 1.53 (0.78, 2.982) .22 36 1.89 (0.88-4.02) .10 28 
TP53 status Positive (17) vs negative (29) 2.05 (0.89-4.71) .091 24 2.26 (0.86-5.91) .097 17 
Blastoid/pleomorphic  Yes (19) vs no (120) 4.31 (2.32 - 8.01) <.000001 55 3.15 (1.58-6.26) .001 44 
sMIPI category Low (16) vs high (67) 1.24 (0.61- 2.56) .54 55 1.32 (0.61-2.86) .46 44 
 Int (49) vs high (67) 0.94 (0.52- 1.73) .85  0.94 (0.48-1.84) .84  
Stage I-IV 1.17 (0.76-1.81) .48  1.05 (0.67-1.66) .83 44 
LDH ratio (pt value:upper limit of normal)  1.95 (1.42-2.65) <.001 44 1.83 (1.29-2.60) <.001 36 
LDH ratio ≥1 Over (63) vs under (55) 2.16 (1.20-3.89) .01 50 2.80 (1.42-5.52) .003 40 
WCC (continuous)  1.001 (0.99-1.005) .37 55 1.002 (0.999-1.006) .256 44 
WCC ≥10 Over (59) vs under (74) 0.97 (0.56-1.67) .92 55 0.73 (0.40-1.34) .32 44 
ECOG Performance Status binary 2-4 (34) vs 0-1 (103) 3.22 (1.87-5.54) <.0001 55 3.37 (1.86 – 6.12) <.0001 44 
Patients (n)PFSOS
HR (95% CI)PNumber of eventsHR (95% CI)PNumber of events
Age (for 1 y increase in age)  1.04 (1.002-1.071) .04 55 1.06 (1.02-1.10) .003 44 
Age (over/ under 75 y) over (71) vs under (68) 1.71 (0.99-2.96) .051 55 1.94 (1.06-3.57) .03 44 
Rituximab Use With (54) vs without (85) 0.92 (0.53-1.6) .764 55 1.05 (0.56-1.93) .88 44 
Risk Group High (51) vs Low (88) 2.19 (1.28-3.73) .004 55 2.36 (1.35-4.27) .005 44 
Ki67 ≥ 30% At least 30% (45) vs <30% (41) 1.53 (0.78, 2.982) .22 36 1.89 (0.88-4.02) .10 28 
TP53 status Positive (17) vs negative (29) 2.05 (0.89-4.71) .091 24 2.26 (0.86-5.91) .097 17 
Blastoid/pleomorphic  Yes (19) vs no (120) 4.31 (2.32 - 8.01) <.000001 55 3.15 (1.58-6.26) .001 44 
sMIPI category Low (16) vs high (67) 1.24 (0.61- 2.56) .54 55 1.32 (0.61-2.86) .46 44 
 Int (49) vs high (67) 0.94 (0.52- 1.73) .85  0.94 (0.48-1.84) .84  
Stage I-IV 1.17 (0.76-1.81) .48  1.05 (0.67-1.66) .83 44 
LDH ratio (pt value:upper limit of normal)  1.95 (1.42-2.65) <.001 44 1.83 (1.29-2.60) <.001 36 
LDH ratio ≥1 Over (63) vs under (55) 2.16 (1.20-3.89) .01 50 2.80 (1.42-5.52) .003 40 
WCC (continuous)  1.001 (0.99-1.005) .37 55 1.002 (0.999-1.006) .256 44 
WCC ≥10 Over (59) vs under (74) 0.97 (0.56-1.67) .92 55 0.73 (0.40-1.34) .32 44 
ECOG Performance Status binary 2-4 (34) vs 0-1 (103) 3.22 (1.87-5.54) <.0001 55 3.37 (1.86 – 6.12) <.0001 44 

WCC, white cell count,

Separate analysis of blastoid histology alone (ie, without pleomorphic) confirmed similar findings

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal