Table 2.

Best overall response, and ORR and CRR among patients receiving parsaclisib by IRC review (cohort 2)

ResponseWG (n = 28)DG (n = 72)All treated patients (N = 100)
Best overall response, n (%)    
CR 3 (10.7) 3 (4.2) 6 (6.0) 
PR 13 (46.4) 39 (54.2) 52 (52.0) 
Stable disease 7 (25.0) 22 (30.6) 29 (29.0) 
Progressive disease 2 (7.1) 2 (2.0) 
Not evaluable/assessed  3 (10.7) 8 (11.1) 11 (11.0) 
ORR, % (95% CI) 57.1 (37.2-75.5) 58.3 (46.1-69.8) 58.0 (47.7-67.8) 
CRR, % (95% CI) 10.7 (2.3-28.2) 4.2 (0.9-11.7) 6.0 (2.2-12.6) 
ResponseWG (n = 28)DG (n = 72)All treated patients (N = 100)
Best overall response, n (%)    
CR 3 (10.7) 3 (4.2) 6 (6.0) 
PR 13 (46.4) 39 (54.2) 52 (52.0) 
Stable disease 7 (25.0) 22 (30.6) 29 (29.0) 
Progressive disease 2 (7.1) 2 (2.0) 
Not evaluable/assessed  3 (10.7) 8 (11.1) 11 (11.0) 
ORR, % (95% CI) 57.1 (37.2-75.5) 58.3 (46.1-69.8) 58.0 (47.7-67.8) 
CRR, % (95% CI) 10.7 (2.3-28.2) 4.2 (0.9-11.7) 6.0 (2.2-12.6) 

CRR, complete response rate.

Two patients in the WG and 2 patients in the DG (4 total overall) were not evaluable owing to no disease per IRC in 3 patients, and insufficient anatomical coverage per IRC in 1 patient; 1 patient in the WG and 6 patients in the DG (7 total overall) did not have postbaseline measurement and could not be assessed.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal