Table 2.

Treatment outcomes

Treatment outcomesPhase 2 and Exp (n = 60)Phase 1b (n = 17)
Best response, n (%)   
CR 22 (37) 4 (24) 
CRh 5 (8)  2 (12) 
CRi 2 (3) 1 (6) 
MLFS 1 (2) 1 (6) 
Partial remission 2 (3) 1 (6) 
Stable disease 21 (35) 3 (18) 
Progressive disease 2 (3) 0 (0) 
Treatment failure 1 (2) 0 (0) 
Not evaluated 4 (7)  5 (29)  
cCR rate [CR/CRi], n (%, 95% CI) 29 (48, adjusted: 30.3-60.5)§  7 (41, 18-67) 
Median time to best response [CR/CRi] (n = 29) (n = 7) 
Months (range) 3 (0.9-11) 3.7 (0.7-6.8) 
Overall response rate [CR/CRi/MLFS], n (%, 95% CI) 30 (50, 37-63) 8 (47, 23-72) 
Treatment outcomesPhase 2 and Exp (n = 60)Phase 1b (n = 17)
Best response, n (%)   
CR 22 (37) 4 (24) 
CRh 5 (8)  2 (12) 
CRi 2 (3) 1 (6) 
MLFS 1 (2) 1 (6) 
Partial remission 2 (3) 1 (6) 
Stable disease 21 (35) 3 (18) 
Progressive disease 2 (3) 0 (0) 
Treatment failure 1 (2) 0 (0) 
Not evaluated 4 (7)  5 (29)  
cCR rate [CR/CRi], n (%, 95% CI) 29 (48, adjusted: 30.3-60.5)§  7 (41, 18-67) 
Median time to best response [CR/CRi] (n = 29) (n = 7) 
Months (range) 3 (0.9-11) 3.7 (0.7-6.8) 
Overall response rate [CR/CRi/MLFS], n (%, 95% CI) 30 (50, 37-63) 8 (47, 23-72) 

MLFS, morphologic leukemia-free state.

All 5 CRh also qualified as CRi.

Early death within the first cycle before assessment could be performed.

Went off treatment before finishing the first cycle of combination therapy.

§

Given the conditional expansion design, which was conditional on the success of 2 prior interim stages, an adjusted 95% CI is provided for the primary end point. The naïve 95% CI on the CR/CRi rate of 48% that does not consider prior interim analyses is 35% to 62%.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal