Table 1.

Randomized clinical trial describing PFS and MRD data in >50 patients, using NGF and sequencing methods with a reported minimum sensitivity of 10−5, in Medline articles and ASCO/ASH/EHA/IMS abstracts published until 2 December 2022.

Clinical trial (phase)NCTDisease settingRandomizationMRD methodMRD-ve rates (%)Median PFS (mo)Reference
ATLAS (3) NCT02659293 NDTE KRD vs R alone NGS 53% vs 31% 59.1 vs 41.4 1  
CASSIOPEIA (3) NCT02541383 NDTE DaraVTD vs VTD NGF 64% vs 43.5% NR vs 51.5 6  
DETERMINATION (3) NCT01208662 NDTE VRD-ASCT vs VRD alone NGS 13% vs 12% 67.5 vs 46.2 2  
GEM2012MENOS65 (3) NCT01916252 NDTE VRD-BuMel vs VRD-Mel NGF 58% vs 55.5% NR vs 75.3 4  
GRIFFIN (2) NCT02874742 NDTE DaraVRD vs VRD NGS 64% vs 30% NR vs NR 5  
IFM 2009 (3) NCT01191060 NDTE VRD-ASCT vs VRD alone NGS 21% vs 15% 50.0 vs 36.0 3  
ALCYONE (3) NCT02195479 NDTI DaraVMP vs VMP NGS 28% vs 7% 36.4 vs 19.3 8  
CLARION (3) NCT01818752 NDTI KMP vs VMP NGF 5% vs 5% 22.3 vs 22.1 9  
MAIA (3) NCT02252172 NDTI DaraRD vs RD NGS 31% vs 10% 62.0 vs 34.3 7  
APOLLO (3) NCT03180736 RRMM DaraPD vs PD NGS 9% vs 2% 12.4 vs 6.9 15  
BOSTON (3) NCT03110562 RRMM SelVD vs VD NGF 5% vs 4% 13.9 vs 9.5 16  
CANDOR (3) NCT03158688 RRMM DaraKD vs KD NGS 18% vs 4% 28.6 vs 15.2 12  
CASTOR(3) NCT02136134 RRMM DaraVD vs VD NGS 15% vs 2% 16.7 vs 7.1 11  
IKEMA (3) NCT03275285 RRMM IsaKD vs KD NGS 30% vs 13% NR vs 19.2 13  
POLLUX (3) NCT02076009 RRMM DaraRD vs RD NGS 33% vs 17% 45.0 vs 17.5 10  
Clinical trial (phase)NCTDisease settingRandomizationMRD methodMRD-ve rates (%)Median PFS (mo)Reference
ATLAS (3) NCT02659293 NDTE KRD vs R alone NGS 53% vs 31% 59.1 vs 41.4 1  
CASSIOPEIA (3) NCT02541383 NDTE DaraVTD vs VTD NGF 64% vs 43.5% NR vs 51.5 6  
DETERMINATION (3) NCT01208662 NDTE VRD-ASCT vs VRD alone NGS 13% vs 12% 67.5 vs 46.2 2  
GEM2012MENOS65 (3) NCT01916252 NDTE VRD-BuMel vs VRD-Mel NGF 58% vs 55.5% NR vs 75.3 4  
GRIFFIN (2) NCT02874742 NDTE DaraVRD vs VRD NGS 64% vs 30% NR vs NR 5  
IFM 2009 (3) NCT01191060 NDTE VRD-ASCT vs VRD alone NGS 21% vs 15% 50.0 vs 36.0 3  
ALCYONE (3) NCT02195479 NDTI DaraVMP vs VMP NGS 28% vs 7% 36.4 vs 19.3 8  
CLARION (3) NCT01818752 NDTI KMP vs VMP NGF 5% vs 5% 22.3 vs 22.1 9  
MAIA (3) NCT02252172 NDTI DaraRD vs RD NGS 31% vs 10% 62.0 vs 34.3 7  
APOLLO (3) NCT03180736 RRMM DaraPD vs PD NGS 9% vs 2% 12.4 vs 6.9 15  
BOSTON (3) NCT03110562 RRMM SelVD vs VD NGF 5% vs 4% 13.9 vs 9.5 16  
CANDOR (3) NCT03158688 RRMM DaraKD vs KD NGS 18% vs 4% 28.6 vs 15.2 12  
CASTOR(3) NCT02136134 RRMM DaraVD vs VD NGS 15% vs 2% 16.7 vs 7.1 11  
IKEMA (3) NCT03275285 RRMM IsaKD vs KD NGS 30% vs 13% NR vs 19.2 13  
POLLUX (3) NCT02076009 RRMM DaraRD vs RD NGS 33% vs 17% 45.0 vs 17.5 10  

DaraKD, daratumumab-carfilzomib-dexamethasone; DaraPD, daratumumab-pomalidomide-dexamethasone; DaraRD, daratumumab-lenalidomide-dexamethasone; DaraVD, daratumumab-bortezomib-dexamethasone; DaraVMP, daratumumab-bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone; DaraVRD, daratumumab-bortezomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone; DaraVTD, daratumumab-bortezomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone; IsaKD, isatuximab-carfilzomib-dexamethasone; KD, carfilzomib-dexamethasone; KRD12, carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (12 cycles); NCT, National Clinical Trial (Clinicaltrials.gov Identification Number); NGF, next-generation flow; NGS, next-generation sequencing; NR, not reached; PD, pomalidomide-dexamethasone; RD, lenalidomide-dexamethasone; SelVD, selinexor-bortezomib-dexamethasone; VD, bortezomib-dexamethasone; VMP, bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone; VRD, bortezomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone; VRd-BuMel, bortezomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone-busulfan-melphalan; VRd-Mel, bortezomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone-melphalan; VTD, bortezomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal