Table 2.

Types of treatments used as prior lines before study entry

Type of treatments used as prior lines before study entry, n (%)First line (n = 403)Second line (n = 183)Third line (n = 85)Later lines (n = 75)
Anthracycline based 222 (55.1) 34 (18.6) 12 (14.1) 8 (10.7) 
Alkylator based 134 (33.3) 40 (21.9) 21 (24.7) 28 (37.3) 
Bendamustine 23 15 
Fludarabine based 12 (3.0) 18 (9.8) 7 (8.2) 8 (10.7) 
Anti-CD20 monotherapy 11 (2.7) 34 (18.6) 16 (18.8) 16 (21.3) 
Standard salvage  1 (0.2) 28 (15.3) 8 (9.4) 8 (10.7) 
Other 19 (4.7) 29 (15.8) 21 (24.7) 7 (9.3) 
Type of treatments used as prior lines before study entry, n (%)First line (n = 403)Second line (n = 183)Third line (n = 85)Later lines (n = 75)
Anthracycline based 222 (55.1) 34 (18.6) 12 (14.1) 8 (10.7) 
Alkylator based 134 (33.3) 40 (21.9) 21 (24.7) 28 (37.3) 
Bendamustine 23 15 
Fludarabine based 12 (3.0) 18 (9.8) 7 (8.2) 8 (10.7) 
Anti-CD20 monotherapy 11 (2.7) 34 (18.6) 16 (18.8) 16 (21.3) 
Standard salvage  1 (0.2) 28 (15.3) 8 (9.4) 8 (10.7) 
Other 19 (4.7) 29 (15.8) 21 (24.7) 7 (9.3) 

Prior maintenance rituximab (any line) was administered to 164 (40%) patients; prior high-dose chemotherapy + autologous stem cell transplant (any line) was administered to 23 (5.7%) patients.

Salvage therapy includes ifosphamide, carboplatin, etoposide; dexamethasone, cytarabine, cisplatin; and etoposide, cisplatin, cytarabine, prednisone; with or without rituximab.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal