Table 4.

Comparing rates of TE in patients with SCD using combined OCP based on estrogen dose and generation of progestin

OCP formulationNo. of usersRates of TE per 1000 person-yUnadjusted HR (95% CI)PAdjusted HR (95% CI)P
Estrogen dose  
Ultra-low dose (<30 μg) 1089 12.2 (6.8-22.0) 0.71 (0.34-1.49) .367 0.76 (0.36-1.60) .472 
Low dose (30 to <50 μg) 1425 17.1 (11.1-26.5) Reference — Reference — 
Progestin generation  
Newer generation progestins 1297 14.9 (9.1-24.4) 1.03 (0.51-2.09) .929 1.05 (0.52-2.13) .895 
Other progestins 1256 14.5 (8.7-24.0) Reference — Reference — 
OCP formulationNo. of usersRates of TE per 1000 person-yUnadjusted HR (95% CI)PAdjusted HR (95% CI)P
Estrogen dose  
Ultra-low dose (<30 μg) 1089 12.2 (6.8-22.0) 0.71 (0.34-1.49) .367 0.76 (0.36-1.60) .472 
Low dose (30 to <50 μg) 1425 17.1 (11.1-26.5) Reference — Reference — 
Progestin generation  
Newer generation progestins 1297 14.9 (9.1-24.4) 1.03 (0.51-2.09) .929 1.05 (0.52-2.13) .895 
Other progestins 1256 14.5 (8.7-24.0) Reference — Reference — 

Adjusted for age group, SCD genotype, severity, and comorbidities of obesity, diabetes, hypertension, and cancer.

Analysis excluded patients receiving varying estrogen dose levels (n = 105) and patients receiving high-dose estrogen (n < 10).

Analysis excluded patients who were prescribed both types of progestin generations (n = 69).

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal