Table 2.

Multivariable linear regression

ProtocolPrimary cumulative analysisSecondary focused analysisInterpretation
CD19 0.20 × age + 0.034 × actual (0-99) marrow disease level
Adjusted r2 = 0.46 
0.94×(1, 2, or 3 depending on marrow disease) + 2.33 (if EM disease)
Adjusted r2 = 0.53 
Cumulative analysis: increasing age and marrow disease are predictive of higher NC AEs
Focused analysis: presence of EM disease, rather than age, and categorical marrow disease were more accurate predictors 
CD22 4.07×(1, 2, or 3 depending on marrow disease) − 3.87 (if prior CAR)
Adjusted r2 = 0.51 
2.465×(1, 2, or 3 depending on marrow disease) − 2.094 (if prior CAR)
Adjusted r2 = 0.58 
Cumulative analysis: higher marrow disease as a categorical factor influences NC AEs, whereas receipt of prior CAR decreases the number of predicted NC AEs
Focused analysis: Same factors influence NC AEs but to a lesser degree 
CD1922 4.81 – 1.89×agecat + 1.16×(1, 2, or 3 depending on marrow disease)
Agecat = 1 if <12 y
Agecat = 2 if 12-17 y
Agecat = 3 if ≥18 y
Adjusted r2 = 0.60 
2.1207 – 2.5172 (if age ≥18) + 0.7241× (1, 2, or 3 depending on marrow disease)
Adjusted r2 = 0.65 
Cumulative analysis: NC AEs are predicted based on the categorical marrow disease; increased age decreases the number of predicted NC AEs
Focused analysis: Same factors influence NC AEs but to a lesser degree in secondary analysis 
ProtocolPrimary cumulative analysisSecondary focused analysisInterpretation
CD19 0.20 × age + 0.034 × actual (0-99) marrow disease level
Adjusted r2 = 0.46 
0.94×(1, 2, or 3 depending on marrow disease) + 2.33 (if EM disease)
Adjusted r2 = 0.53 
Cumulative analysis: increasing age and marrow disease are predictive of higher NC AEs
Focused analysis: presence of EM disease, rather than age, and categorical marrow disease were more accurate predictors 
CD22 4.07×(1, 2, or 3 depending on marrow disease) − 3.87 (if prior CAR)
Adjusted r2 = 0.51 
2.465×(1, 2, or 3 depending on marrow disease) − 2.094 (if prior CAR)
Adjusted r2 = 0.58 
Cumulative analysis: higher marrow disease as a categorical factor influences NC AEs, whereas receipt of prior CAR decreases the number of predicted NC AEs
Focused analysis: Same factors influence NC AEs but to a lesser degree 
CD1922 4.81 – 1.89×agecat + 1.16×(1, 2, or 3 depending on marrow disease)
Agecat = 1 if <12 y
Agecat = 2 if 12-17 y
Agecat = 3 if ≥18 y
Adjusted r2 = 0.60 
2.1207 – 2.5172 (if age ≥18) + 0.7241× (1, 2, or 3 depending on marrow disease)
Adjusted r2 = 0.65 
Cumulative analysis: NC AEs are predicted based on the categorical marrow disease; increased age decreases the number of predicted NC AEs
Focused analysis: Same factors influence NC AEs but to a lesser degree in secondary analysis 
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal