Reclassification of AML ontogeny
Final curated assignment (n = 344) . | Initial assignment . | Sensitivity . | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
t-AML (n = 48) . | AML-MRCWHO2016 (n = 139) . | De novo AML (n = 157) . | ||
t-AML (n = 92) | 48 | 34 | 10 | 52.2% |
AML-MRCWHO2016(n = 136) | 0 | 96 | 40 | 70.6% |
MR-Hx (n = 107) | 0 | 88 | 19 | |
MR-CG (n = 29) | 0 | 8 | 21 | |
De novo AML (n = 116) | 0 | 9 | 107 | 92.2% |
Specificity | 100% | 79.3% | 78.1% | |
Accuracy | 87.2% | 75.9% | 82.8% |
Final curated assignment (n = 344) . | Initial assignment . | Sensitivity . | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
t-AML (n = 48) . | AML-MRCWHO2016 (n = 139) . | De novo AML (n = 157) . | ||
t-AML (n = 92) | 48 | 34 | 10 | 52.2% |
AML-MRCWHO2016(n = 136) | 0 | 96 | 40 | 70.6% |
MR-Hx (n = 107) | 0 | 88 | 19 | |
MR-CG (n = 29) | 0 | 8 | 21 | |
De novo AML (n = 116) | 0 | 9 | 107 | 92.2% |
Specificity | 100% | 79.3% | 78.1% | |
Accuracy | 87.2% | 75.9% | 82.8% |