Table 3.

Risk factor models for cGVHD: landmark analysis from HCT day 120+

c GVHDDeath without cGVHD
HR95% CIPHR95% CIP
Acute GVHD response        
No acute GVHD 1.00   1.00   
SS 1.32 (0.85-2.05) .21 0.96 (0.62-1.50) .86 
SD 2.17 (1.46-3.23) <.01 0.85 (0.53-1.36) .50 
Steroid refractory 1.83 (1.22-2.74) <.01 1.47 (1.00-2.15) .05 
Male sex 1.08 (0.80-1.46) .62 1.01 (0.76-1.35) .93 
Age (50 vs 10 y) 6.27 (3.15-12.5) <.01 1.54 (0.91-2.63) .26 
Donor type       
Matched sibling 1.00   1.00   
Haploidentical 0.23 (0.07-0.74) .01 2.73 (1.60-4.65) <.01 
Matched URD 0.46 (0.26-0.82) <.01 1.78 (1.02-3.10) .04 
Mismatched URD 0.57 (0.14-2.35) .43 2.66 (0.63-11.4) .18 
UCB 0.34 (0.24-0.48) <.01 1.40 (1.00-1.95) .05 
DRI       
Low risk 1.00   1.00   
Intermediate risk 0.58 (0.39-0.86) <.01 2.20 (1.22-3.97) <.01 
High/very high risk 0.43 (0.24-0.77) <.01 3.45 (1.82-6.53) <.01 
HCT comorbidity index       
1.00   1.00   
1-2 1.30 (0.91-1.86) .15 0.98 (0.68-1.40) .90 
≥3 1.18 (0.81-1.71) .40 1.25 (0.88-1.77) .22 
RIC 0.50 (0.33-0.75) <.01 1.55 (1.00-2.42) .05 
c GVHDDeath without cGVHD
HR95% CIPHR95% CIP
Acute GVHD response        
No acute GVHD 1.00   1.00   
SS 1.32 (0.85-2.05) .21 0.96 (0.62-1.50) .86 
SD 2.17 (1.46-3.23) <.01 0.85 (0.53-1.36) .50 
Steroid refractory 1.83 (1.22-2.74) <.01 1.47 (1.00-2.15) .05 
Male sex 1.08 (0.80-1.46) .62 1.01 (0.76-1.35) .93 
Age (50 vs 10 y) 6.27 (3.15-12.5) <.01 1.54 (0.91-2.63) .26 
Donor type       
Matched sibling 1.00   1.00   
Haploidentical 0.23 (0.07-0.74) .01 2.73 (1.60-4.65) <.01 
Matched URD 0.46 (0.26-0.82) <.01 1.78 (1.02-3.10) .04 
Mismatched URD 0.57 (0.14-2.35) .43 2.66 (0.63-11.4) .18 
UCB 0.34 (0.24-0.48) <.01 1.40 (1.00-1.95) .05 
DRI       
Low risk 1.00   1.00   
Intermediate risk 0.58 (0.39-0.86) <.01 2.20 (1.22-3.97) <.01 
High/very high risk 0.43 (0.24-0.77) <.01 3.45 (1.82-6.53) <.01 
HCT comorbidity index       
1.00   1.00   
1-2 1.30 (0.91-1.86) .15 0.98 (0.68-1.40) .90 
≥3 1.18 (0.81-1.71) .40 1.25 (0.88-1.77) .22 
RIC 0.50 (0.33-0.75) <.01 1.55 (1.00-2.42) .05 

Other pairwise comparisons for cGVHD: SR vs SD; HR, 0.84 (95% CI, 0.54-1.31; P = .44); SS vs SD; HR, 0.61 (95% CI, 0.38-0.98; P = .04).

Age was modeled as a continuous variable using a 3-knot restricted cubic spline to model nonlinear effects. Risk of cGVHD increased proportionally with age for ages <∼50 years but was similar for ages >50 years. The reference ages of 50 and 10 years were chosen to show the total magnitude of this effect.15 

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal