Table 1.

Helical parameters for VWF tubules

VWF variantAxial rise per subunit (Å)Helical twist (°)Pitch (Å)Reference
In cells  27.7 83.1 120 16 
D1D2-D′D3 26.2 85.6 110 13  
D1D2-D′D3 28.5 86.0 119 14 
D1D2-D′D3 29.4 86.8 122 15 
D1D2-D′D3A1  27.6 83.1 120 This work 
D1D2-D′D3A1A2A3 27.6 82.6 120 This work 
D1D2D′D3A1 R763G 28.1 82.6 122 This work 
VWF variantAxial rise per subunit (Å)Helical twist (°)Pitch (Å)Reference
In cells  27.7 83.1 120 16 
D1D2-D′D3 26.2 85.6 110 13  
D1D2-D′D3 28.5 86.0 119 14 
D1D2-D′D3 29.4 86.8 122 15 
D1D2-D′D3A1  27.6 83.1 120 This work 
D1D2-D′D3A1A2A3 27.6 82.6 120 This work 
D1D2D′D3A1 R763G 28.1 82.6 122 This work 

These rows emphasize the close agreement between the high-resolution VWF tubule structure reported in this work and the parameters measured from full-length VWF tubules in WPBs in endothelial cells.

Heterogeneity in pitch was observed in this study. Values in this table correspond to the major bin used for reconstructing the VWF low-resolution structure.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal