Table 1.

Clinical diagnostics for Ph-like ALL

CategoryLaboratory testClinical utilityAdvantagesDisadvantages
Flow cytometry 
 Surface TSLPR immunophenotyping Identification of increased TSLPR protein expression that usually correlates with CRLF2 rearrangements Widely available testing platform
Rapid turnaround time
Cost-effective 
Only specific for CRLF2-overexpressing B-ALL
Does not distinguish between CRLF2-overexpressing Ph-like ALL vs non–Ph-like ALL 
FISH 
 ABL1, ABL2, CSF1R/PDGFRB, PDGFRA, CRLF2, EPOR, JAK2, NTRK3
break-apart probes 
Identification of known 3′ kinase genetic rearrangements in Ph-like ALL Widely available testing platform
Rapid turnaround time
Cost-effective 
Requires further molecular confirmation to identify specific 5′ fusion partner genes 
Gene expression profiling 
 LDA Detection of the kinase-activated Ph-like gene signature Rapid turnaround time
Cost-effective
Capable of direct detection of P2RY8-CRLF2 fusions 
Requires downstream molecular testing to identify specific kinase fusions
Testing available through few reference laboratories 
Next-generation sequencing 
 Anchored multiplex PCR-based RNA sequencing Detection of specific gene fusions that can guide potential targeted therapy approaches Single assay capable of identifying canonical Ph-like ALL kinase fusions
Often can identify novel/previously unknown 5′ fusion partners
Moderately cost-effective given comprehensive analysis (may be combined with DNA-based NGS in a single assay) 
Slower time to results
May miss detection of fusions involving immunoglobulin or T-cell receptor genes
May not detect point mutations or insertions/deletions outside of customized gene panels 
 Comparative genomic hybridization microarray Genome-wide identification of copy number changes in genes relevant to hematologic malignancies Can detect Ph-like gene fusions resulting from interstitial deletions (eg, P2RY8-CRLF2, EBF1-PDGFRB)
Can detect IKZF1 and other transcription factor deletions enriched in Ph-like ALL
Rapid turnaround time 
Cannot detect gene fusions resulting from chromosomal translocations
Relatively higher cost given limited scope of results 
 DNA amplicon-based NGS panels Identification of single-nucleotide variants, indels, internal tandem duplications, and copy number variations recurrently mutated in hematologic malignancies Rapid turnaround time
Can detect IKZF1 and other transcription factor deletions enriched in Ph-like ALL
Can detect sequence mutations in JAK-STAT and RAS pathway genes occurring in Ph-like ALL 
Does not detect gene fusions
Expensive 
 Whole transcriptome sequencing (RNA sequencing) Comprehensive genome-wide and unbiased RNA-based analysis of gene expression, fusion transcripts, and mutations Single assay to identify the specific gene signature, fusions and mutations of Ph-like ALL
Can identify novel/previously unknown kinase alterations 
Limited clinical testing availability, mostly performed in a research setting at the present time
Very expensive
Long time to results 
CategoryLaboratory testClinical utilityAdvantagesDisadvantages
Flow cytometry 
 Surface TSLPR immunophenotyping Identification of increased TSLPR protein expression that usually correlates with CRLF2 rearrangements Widely available testing platform
Rapid turnaround time
Cost-effective 
Only specific for CRLF2-overexpressing B-ALL
Does not distinguish between CRLF2-overexpressing Ph-like ALL vs non–Ph-like ALL 
FISH 
 ABL1, ABL2, CSF1R/PDGFRB, PDGFRA, CRLF2, EPOR, JAK2, NTRK3
break-apart probes 
Identification of known 3′ kinase genetic rearrangements in Ph-like ALL Widely available testing platform
Rapid turnaround time
Cost-effective 
Requires further molecular confirmation to identify specific 5′ fusion partner genes 
Gene expression profiling 
 LDA Detection of the kinase-activated Ph-like gene signature Rapid turnaround time
Cost-effective
Capable of direct detection of P2RY8-CRLF2 fusions 
Requires downstream molecular testing to identify specific kinase fusions
Testing available through few reference laboratories 
Next-generation sequencing 
 Anchored multiplex PCR-based RNA sequencing Detection of specific gene fusions that can guide potential targeted therapy approaches Single assay capable of identifying canonical Ph-like ALL kinase fusions
Often can identify novel/previously unknown 5′ fusion partners
Moderately cost-effective given comprehensive analysis (may be combined with DNA-based NGS in a single assay) 
Slower time to results
May miss detection of fusions involving immunoglobulin or T-cell receptor genes
May not detect point mutations or insertions/deletions outside of customized gene panels 
 Comparative genomic hybridization microarray Genome-wide identification of copy number changes in genes relevant to hematologic malignancies Can detect Ph-like gene fusions resulting from interstitial deletions (eg, P2RY8-CRLF2, EBF1-PDGFRB)
Can detect IKZF1 and other transcription factor deletions enriched in Ph-like ALL
Rapid turnaround time 
Cannot detect gene fusions resulting from chromosomal translocations
Relatively higher cost given limited scope of results 
 DNA amplicon-based NGS panels Identification of single-nucleotide variants, indels, internal tandem duplications, and copy number variations recurrently mutated in hematologic malignancies Rapid turnaround time
Can detect IKZF1 and other transcription factor deletions enriched in Ph-like ALL
Can detect sequence mutations in JAK-STAT and RAS pathway genes occurring in Ph-like ALL 
Does not detect gene fusions
Expensive 
 Whole transcriptome sequencing (RNA sequencing) Comprehensive genome-wide and unbiased RNA-based analysis of gene expression, fusion transcripts, and mutations Single assay to identify the specific gene signature, fusions and mutations of Ph-like ALL
Can identify novel/previously unknown kinase alterations 
Limited clinical testing availability, mostly performed in a research setting at the present time
Very expensive
Long time to results 

TSLPR, thymic stromal lymphopoietin receptor.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal