Table 1.

Baseline patient characteristics

Characteristic, n (%)CPX-351 (n = 53)7 + 3 (n = 39)Nominal P value*
Age, y    
 60-69 37 (70) 33 (85) .10 
 70-75 16 (30) 6 (15)  
Male 34 (64) 23 (59) .61 
ECOG performance status    
 0 18 (34) 17 (44) .35 
 1 31 (58) 20 (51) .49 
 2 4 (8) 2 (5) .30 
AML subtype    
 Therapy-related AML 11 (21) 9 (23) .79 
 AML with antecedent MDS    
  With prior HMA 14 (26) 14 (36) .33 
  Without prior HMA 8 (15) 5 (13) .23 
 AML with antecedent CMML 3 (6) .19 
 de novo AML with MDS karyotype 17 (32) 11 (28) .69 
Cytogenetic risk by NCCN    
 Favorable 3/49 (6) .18 
 Intermediate 25/49 (51) 18/37 (49) .83 
 Poor 21/49 (43) 19/37 (51) .43 
Genetic risk by ELN 2017    
 Favorable 5/51 (10) .06 
 Intermediate 14/51 (27) 14/38 (37) .35 
 Adverse 32/51 (63) 24/38 (63) .97 
Median bone marrow blasts (range), % 30 (4.5, 87) 28 (7, 68) .24 
WBC count <20 000/μL 48 (91) 35 (90) .80 
Last response prior to alloHCT    
 CR + CRi 40 (75) 24 (62) .15 
 CR 30 (57) 19 (49) .45 
 CRi 10 (19) 5 (13) .17 
 No response 13 (25) 15 (38) .15 
Median HCT comorbidity index (range) 4 (0, 8) 3 (0, 8) .65 
Transplant donor    
 HLA-identical sibling 11 (21) 3 (8) .06 
 Haploidentical 4 (8) 5 (13) .19 
 Matched unrelated 26 (49) 19 (49) .97 
 Mismatched unrelated 2 (4) 2 (5) .37 
 Unknown/missing 7 (13) 9 (23) .22 
Graft source    
 Bone marrow 4 (8) 1 (3) .23 
 Cord blood 1 (2) 1 (3) .49 
 Peripheral blood 40 (75) 27 (69) .51 
 Unknown/missing 8 (15) 10 (26) .21 
Conditioning regimen    
 Myeloablative 9/45 (20) 5/31 (16) .22 
 Reduced intensity 23/45 (51) 18/31 (58) .55 
Total lines of treatment for patients who were nonresponders or relapsed before alloHCT 13 14 .24 
 1  
 2  
 3  
 4  
 5  
 6  
Characteristic, n (%)CPX-351 (n = 53)7 + 3 (n = 39)Nominal P value*
Age, y    
 60-69 37 (70) 33 (85) .10 
 70-75 16 (30) 6 (15)  
Male 34 (64) 23 (59) .61 
ECOG performance status    
 0 18 (34) 17 (44) .35 
 1 31 (58) 20 (51) .49 
 2 4 (8) 2 (5) .30 
AML subtype    
 Therapy-related AML 11 (21) 9 (23) .79 
 AML with antecedent MDS    
  With prior HMA 14 (26) 14 (36) .33 
  Without prior HMA 8 (15) 5 (13) .23 
 AML with antecedent CMML 3 (6) .19 
 de novo AML with MDS karyotype 17 (32) 11 (28) .69 
Cytogenetic risk by NCCN    
 Favorable 3/49 (6) .18 
 Intermediate 25/49 (51) 18/37 (49) .83 
 Poor 21/49 (43) 19/37 (51) .43 
Genetic risk by ELN 2017    
 Favorable 5/51 (10) .06 
 Intermediate 14/51 (27) 14/38 (37) .35 
 Adverse 32/51 (63) 24/38 (63) .97 
Median bone marrow blasts (range), % 30 (4.5, 87) 28 (7, 68) .24 
WBC count <20 000/μL 48 (91) 35 (90) .80 
Last response prior to alloHCT    
 CR + CRi 40 (75) 24 (62) .15 
 CR 30 (57) 19 (49) .45 
 CRi 10 (19) 5 (13) .17 
 No response 13 (25) 15 (38) .15 
Median HCT comorbidity index (range) 4 (0, 8) 3 (0, 8) .65 
Transplant donor    
 HLA-identical sibling 11 (21) 3 (8) .06 
 Haploidentical 4 (8) 5 (13) .19 
 Matched unrelated 26 (49) 19 (49) .97 
 Mismatched unrelated 2 (4) 2 (5) .37 
 Unknown/missing 7 (13) 9 (23) .22 
Graft source    
 Bone marrow 4 (8) 1 (3) .23 
 Cord blood 1 (2) 1 (3) .49 
 Peripheral blood 40 (75) 27 (69) .51 
 Unknown/missing 8 (15) 10 (26) .21 
Conditioning regimen    
 Myeloablative 9/45 (20) 5/31 (16) .22 
 Reduced intensity 23/45 (51) 18/31 (58) .55 
Total lines of treatment for patients who were nonresponders or relapsed before alloHCT 13 14 .24 
 1  
 2  
 3  
 4  
 5  
 6  

CIBMTR, Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research; CMML, chronic myelomonocytic leukemia; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; HMA, hypomethylating agent; NCCN, National Comprehensive Cancer Network; WBC, white blood cell.

*

All P values are nominal and do not imply statistical significance.

Conditioning regimen intensity classified by CIBMTR criteria.21 

Total lines of treatment, including study treatment and additional treatment (≥second line) received after completion of study treatment and before alloHCT.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal