Table 2.

Comparison of clinical outcomes between SCHOLAR-5 and ZUMA-5

SCHOLAR-5
(n = 85)*
ZUMA-5
(n = 86)
Treatment effect
Time-to-event outcomes Median months (95% CI) Median months (95% CI) Hazard ratio (95% CI) 
OS 59.8 (21.9-NE) NR (31.6, NE) 0.42 (0.21, 0.83) 
PFS 12.7 (6.2, 14.7) NR (23.5, NE) 0.30 (0.18, 0.49) 
Time to next treatment 23.4 (9.5, NE) NR (NE, NE) 0.54 (0.32-0.89) 
Response outcomes Responders (%) Responders (%) Odds ratio (95% CI) 
ORR 42 (49.9%) 81 (94.2%) OR: 16.2 (5.6, 46.9) 
CR 25 (29.9%)* 68 (79.1%) OR: 8.9 (4.3, 18.3) 
SCHOLAR-5
(n = 85)*
ZUMA-5
(n = 86)
Treatment effect
Time-to-event outcomes Median months (95% CI) Median months (95% CI) Hazard ratio (95% CI) 
OS 59.8 (21.9-NE) NR (31.6, NE) 0.42 (0.21, 0.83) 
PFS 12.7 (6.2, 14.7) NR (23.5, NE) 0.30 (0.18, 0.49) 
Time to next treatment 23.4 (9.5, NE) NR (NE, NE) 0.54 (0.32-0.89) 
Response outcomes Responders (%) Responders (%) Odds ratio (95% CI) 
ORR 42 (49.9%) 81 (94.2%) OR: 16.2 (5.6, 46.9) 
CR 25 (29.9%)* 68 (79.1%) OR: 8.9 (4.3, 18.3) 

Note that rounding of patients after classifying as responders or nonresponders in the SCHOLAR-5 weighted sample may lead to a small variability in total sample size.

*

SCHOLAR-5 sample size for PFS was 56.

Response assessments includes CT-based and PET-based scans with limited confirmatory bone marrow biopsies. Thirteen patients with imaging CRs did not receive a confirmatory bone marrow biopsy.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal