Table 3.

GRADE test accuracy evidence summary for VWF:GPIbM in patients with suspected VWD

Sensitivity: 0.62-0.82 Specificity: 0.90-0.97  Prevalences: 3%, 20%, 50% 
Sensitivity: 0.62-0.82 Specificity: 0.90-0.97  Prevalences: 3%, 20%, 50% 
OutcomeStudies (n); patients (n)Study designFactors that may decrease certainty of evidenceEffect per 1000 patients testedTest accuracy CoE
Risk of biasIndirectnessInconsistencyImprecisionPublication biasPretest probability of 3%*Pretest probability of 20%Pretest probability of 50%
True positives (patients with VWD) 2;249 Cohort & case-control type studies Serious§ Not serious Not serious Not serious None 19-25 124-164 310-410 ⨁⨁◯◯ LOW 
False negatives (patients incorrectly classified as not having VWD) 5-11 36-76 90-190 
True negatives (patients without VWD) 2;513 Cohort & case-control type studies Serious§ Not serious Not serious Not serious None 873-941 720-776 450-485 ⨁⨁◯◯ LOW 
False positives (patients incorrectly classified as having VWD) 29-97 24-80 15-50 
 
OutcomeStudies (n); patients (n)Study designFactors that may decrease certainty of evidenceEffect per 1000 patients testedTest accuracy CoE
Risk of biasIndirectnessInconsistencyImprecisionPublication biasPretest probability of 3%*Pretest probability of 20%Pretest probability of 50%
True positives (patients with VWD) 2;249 Cohort & case-control type studies Serious§ Not serious Not serious Not serious None 19-25 124-164 310-410 ⨁⨁◯◯ LOW 
False negatives (patients incorrectly classified as not having VWD) 5-11 36-76 90-190 
True negatives (patients without VWD) 2;513 Cohort & case-control type studies Serious§ Not serious Not serious Not serious None 873-941 720-776 450-485 ⨁⨁◯◯ LOW 
False positives (patients incorrectly classified as having VWD) 29-97 24-80 15-50 
 
*

Typically seen in patients investigated for VWD because of a personal history of abnormal laboratory test (eg, increased PTT).

Typically seen in patients investigated for VWD because of a personal history of bleeding symptoms (eg, mucocutaneous bleeding) (Quiroga, 2007).46 

Typically seen in patients investigated for VWD as a first-degree relative of a patient with VWD.

§

Serious patient selection risk of bias due to case-control design. Diagnostic test accuracy results for classifying type 2 VWD patients (using a 0.6 ratio), not for diagnosing VWD.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal