Table 1.

GRADE test accuracy evidence summary for VWF:RCo in patients with suspected VWD

Sensitivity: 0.83-1.00 Specificity: 0.87-0.95  Prevalences: 3%, 20%, 50% 
Sensitivity: 0.83-1.00 Specificity: 0.87-0.95  Prevalences: 3%, 20%, 50% 
OutcomeStudies (n); patients (n)Study designFactors that may decrease certainty of evidenceEffect per 1000 patients testedTest accuracy CoE
Risk of biasIndirectnessInconsistencyImprecisionPublication biasPretest probability of 3%*Pretest probability of 20%Pretest probability of 50%§
True positives (patients with VWD) 4;337 Cohort & case-control type studies Serious Not serious Not serious Not serious None 25-30 166-200 415-500 ⨁⨁⨁◯ MODERATE 
False negatives (patients incorrectly classified as not having VWD) 0-0-34 0-85 
True negatives (patients without VWD) 4;584 Cohort & case-control type studies Serious Not serious Not serious Not serious None 844-922 696-760 435-475 ⨁⨁◯◯ LOW 
False positives (patients incorrectly classified as having VWD) 48-126 40-104 25-65 
 
OutcomeStudies (n); patients (n)Study designFactors that may decrease certainty of evidenceEffect per 1000 patients testedTest accuracy CoE
Risk of biasIndirectnessInconsistencyImprecisionPublication biasPretest probability of 3%*Pretest probability of 20%Pretest probability of 50%§
True positives (patients with VWD) 4;337 Cohort & case-control type studies Serious Not serious Not serious Not serious None 25-30 166-200 415-500 ⨁⨁⨁◯ MODERATE 
False negatives (patients incorrectly classified as not having VWD) 0-0-34 0-85 
True negatives (patients without VWD) 4;584 Cohort & case-control type studies Serious Not serious Not serious Not serious None 844-922 696-760 435-475 ⨁⨁◯◯ LOW 
False positives (patients incorrectly classified as having VWD) 48-126 40-104 25-65 
 
*

Typically seen in patients investigated for VWD because of a personal history of bleeding symptoms (eg, mucocutaneous bleeding) (Quiroga, 2007).46 

Typically seen in patients investigated for VWD as a first-degree relative of a patient with VWD.

Serious patient selection risk of bias due to case-control design. Also, 3 of the 4 studies (Boender [2018],47  Vangenechten [2018],48  and Sagheer [2016])49  investigated test accuracy for classifying type 2 VWD patients (using a ratio of 0.6), not for diagnosing VWD. The majority of included studies were judged to be low risk of bias for test and reference standard interpretation. Although there was unclear reporting regarding flow and timing in some studies, the certainty of evidence was generally not downgraded for risk of bias. The patient selection risk of bias was moderate/high in all studies.

§

Typically seen in patients investigated for VWD because of a personal history of abnormal laboratory test (eg, increased Partial Thromboplastin Time (PTT)).

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal