Table 4.

Results of selected prospective clinical trials for newly diagnosed non-transplant-eligible patients carrying high-risk features

TrialRegimenStudy design (primary endpoint)Study definition of HRNo. HR patients (%)Outcomes in HR vs SRPFS ratesMRD (%)
SWOG-12118  elo-VRd vs VRd Phase 2, only HR patients, transplant ineligible (PSF) HR-GEP, t(14;16), t(14;20), del (17p), amp(1q21), primary PCL, or elevated serum LDH (≥2 × ULN) 100 (100) Median FU 53 mo:
no difference in median PFS 
Median PFS:
31.47 mo (elo-VRd) vs 33.64 mo (VRd)
P = .45 
— 
SWOG S077786  VRd vs Rd Phase 3, transplant ineligible (PSF) t(4;14), t(14;16), or del (17p) 104 (33) Median PFS in HR pts: 38 (VRd) vs 16 (Rd) mo*P = .19
34 (VRd) vs 17 (Rd) moP = .96
(median overall FU 55 mo) 
Unstratified median PFS:
43 mo (VRd) vs 30 mo (Rd) 
— 
ALCYONE88,94 D-VMp vs VMp Phase 3, transplant ineligible (PSF) t(4;14), t(14;16), or del(17p) 98 (14) PFS in HR pts NR
HzR (95% CI) 0.78 (0.4-1.43)
CR rate (HR) and MRD (HR) NR 
HR pts: NR vs NR
ITT: 36.4 mo (D-VMp) vs 19.3 mo (VMp) 
HR pts: NR vs NR
ITT: 28% (D-VMp) vs 7% (VMp) 
MAIA87,92 D-Rd vs Rd Phase 3, transplant ineligible (PSF) t(4;14), t(14;16), or del(17p) 92 (12) PFS in HR pts:
NR (D-Rd) vs 29.6 mo (Rd)
HzR: (95% CI) 0.57 (0.32-1.04)
CR rate (HR) and MRD (HR) NR 
HR pts: 45.3 (D-Rd) vs 29.6 mo (Rd)
ITT: NR (D-Rd) vs 38.8 mo (Rd) 
HR pts: NR vs NR
ITT: 29% (D-Rd) vs 9% (Rd) 
TrialRegimenStudy design (primary endpoint)Study definition of HRNo. HR patients (%)Outcomes in HR vs SRPFS ratesMRD (%)
SWOG-12118  elo-VRd vs VRd Phase 2, only HR patients, transplant ineligible (PSF) HR-GEP, t(14;16), t(14;20), del (17p), amp(1q21), primary PCL, or elevated serum LDH (≥2 × ULN) 100 (100) Median FU 53 mo:
no difference in median PFS 
Median PFS:
31.47 mo (elo-VRd) vs 33.64 mo (VRd)
P = .45 
— 
SWOG S077786  VRd vs Rd Phase 3, transplant ineligible (PSF) t(4;14), t(14;16), or del (17p) 104 (33) Median PFS in HR pts: 38 (VRd) vs 16 (Rd) mo*P = .19
34 (VRd) vs 17 (Rd) moP = .96
(median overall FU 55 mo) 
Unstratified median PFS:
43 mo (VRd) vs 30 mo (Rd) 
— 
ALCYONE88,94 D-VMp vs VMp Phase 3, transplant ineligible (PSF) t(4;14), t(14;16), or del(17p) 98 (14) PFS in HR pts NR
HzR (95% CI) 0.78 (0.4-1.43)
CR rate (HR) and MRD (HR) NR 
HR pts: NR vs NR
ITT: 36.4 mo (D-VMp) vs 19.3 mo (VMp) 
HR pts: NR vs NR
ITT: 28% (D-VMp) vs 7% (VMp) 
MAIA87,92 D-Rd vs Rd Phase 3, transplant ineligible (PSF) t(4;14), t(14;16), or del(17p) 92 (12) PFS in HR pts:
NR (D-Rd) vs 29.6 mo (Rd)
HzR: (95% CI) 0.57 (0.32-1.04)
CR rate (HR) and MRD (HR) NR 
HR pts: 45.3 (D-Rd) vs 29.6 mo (Rd)
ITT: NR (D-Rd) vs 38.8 mo (Rd) 
HR pts: NR vs NR
ITT: 29% (D-Rd) vs 9% (Rd) 

CI, confidence interval; CR, complete response; D-, daratumumab; elo, elotuzumab; GEP, gene expressing profiling; HR, high-risk; HzR, hazard ratio; ITT, intention-to-treat; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; NE, not estimable; NR, not reported; NS, not significant; Rd, lenalidomide, dexamethasone; PCL, plasma cell leukemia; PFS, progression-free survival; pts, points; SR, standard risk; ULN, upper limit of normal; VMp, bortezomib, melphalan, prednisone; VRd, bortezomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone.

*

In the 44 pts HR by FISH.

In the 17 pts with t(4;14) by FISH.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal