Table 3.

Rituximab-era retrospective studies

Therapeutic strategyStudy designnPatient characteristicsTreatment detailsMedian follow-up (y)PFSOS (95% CI)
Combined modality vs standard R-CHOP Multicenter Osaka Lymphoma Study Group48  137 All LS-DLBCL Nonbulky only (<10 cm) Details not specified R-CHOP 3-4 + RT vs R-CHOP 6-8 2.83 3-y PFS* 74% R-CHOP vs 89.7% R-CHOP + IFRT 3-y OS* 85.5% R-CHOP vs 96.2% R-CHOP+IFRT 
Combined modality vs standard R-CHOP Single-center Memorial-Sloan Kettering24  261 All LS-DLBCL Nonbulky only (<10 cm) Age: all (>60 = 48%) stage II: 32% Extranodal: 51% Bulk: 0% (excluded) R-CHOP ×3-4 R-CHOP 3-4 + RT R-CHOP ×6 R-CHOP ×6 + RT 4.7 5-y PFS 92% 94% R-CHOP ×3-4 89% R-CHOP x3 + IFRT 79.9% R-CHOP x6 89.8% R-CHOP x6 + IFRT 5-y OS 93% 100% R-CHOP ×3-4 93.5% R-CHOP + RT 84.5% R-CHOPx6 97.8% R-CHOPx6 + RT 
Combined modality vs standard R-CHOP Multicenter SEER Database49  874 Elderly LS-DLBCL Bulk status not reported Age: ≥66 y Stage II: 40% B Symptoms: 11% Extranodal: 33% R-CHOP ×3-4 + RT vs R-CHOP ×6-8 4.2 5-y EFS 24% R-CHOP ×3-4 + IFRT vs 33% R-CHOP ×6-8 HR 0.71 P = .02 5-y OS* 77% R-CHOP ×3-4 + RT vs 76% R-CHOP ×6-8 
Standard chemo +/− IFRT Single-center MD Anderson7  469 (190 LS- DLBCL) Stage I-IV included Bulk permitted: defined as >5 cm Age: all (medial 61 y) Stage I/II: 20%/20% Other parameters not specifically reported for LS-DLBCL R-CHOP-like 6-8 +/− RT 30% “other” chemo LS-DLBCL cohort results: 5-y PFS 81% overall 82% RT vs 68% no RT (P = .003) LS-DLBCL cohort results: 5-y OS 83% overall 92% RT vs 73% no RT (P = .007) 
Standard R-CHOP +/− RT Multicenter NCCN Institutions51  841 (402 LS-DLBCL) Stages I-IV included Bulk permitted: Defined as 10 cm Age: all (median 57 y) Stage I/II: 26%/22% B Symptoms: 28.5% Extranodal: 26% Bulk: 23% R-CHOP ×6-8 +/− IFRT 4.5 LS-DLBCL cohort results: HR 1.81, P = .15 for RT LS-DLBCL cohort results: OS HR 0.94, P = .89 for RT 
Standard R-CHOP +/− RT Single-center Seoul National University Hospital50  198 All LS-DLBCL Bulk permitted: defined as ≥7 cm Age: Median 55 Stage II: 67% PS > 1: 7.6% Elevated LDH: 41% B Symptoms: 14% Extranodal: 63% Bulk: 30% R-CHOP ×6-8 +/− IFRT 3.3 3-y PFS 85.8% 83.9% no RT vs 92.7% RT P = .021 3-y OS 88.9% 95% no RT vs 87.1% RT P = .014 
Combined modality vs abbreviated or standard R-CHOP alone Single-center Memorial Sloan-Kettering20  341 Stage I only Nonbulky only (≤7.5 cm) Age: Median 60 y Stage II: 0% PS > 1: 3% Elevated LDH 22% B Symptoms: 3% Extranodal: 66% Bulk: 0% (excluded) R-CHOP ×3-4 +/− RT R-CHOP ×6 +/− RT 5.5 10-y PFS 77% 63% Extranodal vs 85% Nodal HR 0.35 for extranodal disease in favor of RT P < .001 5-y OS 94% 10-y OS 77% 70% extranodal vs 89% Nodal HR 0.26 for extranodal disease in favor of RT P < 0.001 
PET-adapted Single-center BC Cancer21  319 All LS-DLBCL Nonbulky only (<10 cm) No B Symptoms Age: median 68 y Stage II: 8% PS > 1: 13% B symptoms: 0% Elevated LDH: 52% Extranodal: 37% Bulk: 0% (excluded) PE+: 18% R-CHOP x3 then PET+: RT PET: R-CHOP ×1 6.25 5-y PFS 84% 88% PET* vs 74% PET+* 5-y OS 87% 90% PET* vs 77% PET+* 
Therapeutic strategyStudy designnPatient characteristicsTreatment detailsMedian follow-up (y)PFSOS (95% CI)
Combined modality vs standard R-CHOP Multicenter Osaka Lymphoma Study Group48  137 All LS-DLBCL Nonbulky only (<10 cm) Details not specified R-CHOP 3-4 + RT vs R-CHOP 6-8 2.83 3-y PFS* 74% R-CHOP vs 89.7% R-CHOP + IFRT 3-y OS* 85.5% R-CHOP vs 96.2% R-CHOP+IFRT 
Combined modality vs standard R-CHOP Single-center Memorial-Sloan Kettering24  261 All LS-DLBCL Nonbulky only (<10 cm) Age: all (>60 = 48%) stage II: 32% Extranodal: 51% Bulk: 0% (excluded) R-CHOP ×3-4 R-CHOP 3-4 + RT R-CHOP ×6 R-CHOP ×6 + RT 4.7 5-y PFS 92% 94% R-CHOP ×3-4 89% R-CHOP x3 + IFRT 79.9% R-CHOP x6 89.8% R-CHOP x6 + IFRT 5-y OS 93% 100% R-CHOP ×3-4 93.5% R-CHOP + RT 84.5% R-CHOPx6 97.8% R-CHOPx6 + RT 
Combined modality vs standard R-CHOP Multicenter SEER Database49  874 Elderly LS-DLBCL Bulk status not reported Age: ≥66 y Stage II: 40% B Symptoms: 11% Extranodal: 33% R-CHOP ×3-4 + RT vs R-CHOP ×6-8 4.2 5-y EFS 24% R-CHOP ×3-4 + IFRT vs 33% R-CHOP ×6-8 HR 0.71 P = .02 5-y OS* 77% R-CHOP ×3-4 + RT vs 76% R-CHOP ×6-8 
Standard chemo +/− IFRT Single-center MD Anderson7  469 (190 LS- DLBCL) Stage I-IV included Bulk permitted: defined as >5 cm Age: all (medial 61 y) Stage I/II: 20%/20% Other parameters not specifically reported for LS-DLBCL R-CHOP-like 6-8 +/− RT 30% “other” chemo LS-DLBCL cohort results: 5-y PFS 81% overall 82% RT vs 68% no RT (P = .003) LS-DLBCL cohort results: 5-y OS 83% overall 92% RT vs 73% no RT (P = .007) 
Standard R-CHOP +/− RT Multicenter NCCN Institutions51  841 (402 LS-DLBCL) Stages I-IV included Bulk permitted: Defined as 10 cm Age: all (median 57 y) Stage I/II: 26%/22% B Symptoms: 28.5% Extranodal: 26% Bulk: 23% R-CHOP ×6-8 +/− IFRT 4.5 LS-DLBCL cohort results: HR 1.81, P = .15 for RT LS-DLBCL cohort results: OS HR 0.94, P = .89 for RT 
Standard R-CHOP +/− RT Single-center Seoul National University Hospital50  198 All LS-DLBCL Bulk permitted: defined as ≥7 cm Age: Median 55 Stage II: 67% PS > 1: 7.6% Elevated LDH: 41% B Symptoms: 14% Extranodal: 63% Bulk: 30% R-CHOP ×6-8 +/− IFRT 3.3 3-y PFS 85.8% 83.9% no RT vs 92.7% RT P = .021 3-y OS 88.9% 95% no RT vs 87.1% RT P = .014 
Combined modality vs abbreviated or standard R-CHOP alone Single-center Memorial Sloan-Kettering20  341 Stage I only Nonbulky only (≤7.5 cm) Age: Median 60 y Stage II: 0% PS > 1: 3% Elevated LDH 22% B Symptoms: 3% Extranodal: 66% Bulk: 0% (excluded) R-CHOP ×3-4 +/− RT R-CHOP ×6 +/− RT 5.5 10-y PFS 77% 63% Extranodal vs 85% Nodal HR 0.35 for extranodal disease in favor of RT P < .001 5-y OS 94% 10-y OS 77% 70% extranodal vs 89% Nodal HR 0.26 for extranodal disease in favor of RT P < 0.001 
PET-adapted Single-center BC Cancer21  319 All LS-DLBCL Nonbulky only (<10 cm) No B Symptoms Age: median 68 y Stage II: 8% PS > 1: 13% B symptoms: 0% Elevated LDH: 52% Extranodal: 37% Bulk: 0% (excluded) PE+: 18% R-CHOP x3 then PET+: RT PET: R-CHOP ×1 6.25 5-y PFS 84% 88% PET* vs 74% PET+* 5-y OS 87% 90% PET* vs 77% PET+* 

IFRT, involved field radiotherapy.

*

Not statistically significant.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal