Table 1.

Recently approved drugs for AML

DrugIndicationRoute of administrationSignificant findings in clinical trialsIssues needing special attention
Midostaurin
Rydapt® 
Newly diagnosed FLT3 mut AML in combination with intensive therapy (FDA, EMA) Oral Phase 3 trial (RATIFY):
intensive chemotherapy + midostaurin vs placebo:
4-year OS: 51.4% midostaurin vs 44.3% placebo 
Careful administration of comedications with strong CYP3A4 inhibitory activity 
CPX-351
Vyxeos® 
Newly diagnosed tAML, AML-MRC (FDA, EMA) IV Phase 3 trial:
median OS 9.6 (CPX-351) vs 6.0 months (standard chemotherapy) 
Side effects similar to standard chemotherapy but less alopecia 
Gemtuzumab ozogamicin
Mylotarg® 
Newly diagnosed CD33+ AML (FDA, EMA) in combination with intensive therapy, R/R CD33+ AML in combination with intensive therapy (FDA) IV Phase 3 trial (ALFA-0701):
intensive chemotherapy +/− GO:
2-year OS: 53.2% GO vs 41.9% standard 
Hepatotoxicity (including veno-occlusive disease), infusion-related reactions, infection 
Venetoclax
Venclexta® 
Newly diagnosed AML in patients ≥75 years or with comorbidities precluding intensive therapy; in combination with LDAC or HMA (FDA) Oral VIALE-A trial:
VEN-AZA vs placebo:
median OS 14.7 (venetoclax) vs 9.6 months (placebo)
VIALE-C trial:
LDAC-VEN vs placebo:
median OS 8.4 (venetoclax)
vs 4.1 months (placebo) 
Hematological toxicity (follow recommended dose adjustments), neutropenic fever, dose adjustments if comedications with strong CYP3A4 inhibitory activity, tumor lysis syndrome (but much rarer than in CLL) 
Glasdegib
Daurismo® 
Newly diagnosed AML in patients ≥75 years or with comorbidities precluding intensive therapy; in combination with LDAC (FDA, EMA) Oral Phase 2 BRIGHT AML 1003 trial:
LDAC +/− glasdegib:
median OS was 8.8 (LDAC-glasdegib) vs 4.9 months (LDAC alone) 
Musculoskeletal pain 
CC-486
Onureg® 
Maintenance therapy AML patients in CR/CRi after intensive induction who are unable to complete intensive curative therapy Oral Phase 3 QUAZAR AML-001:
CC-486 vs placebo:
median OS 24.7 (CC-486) vs 14.8 months (placebo) 
GI toxicity, neutropenia 
Enasidenib
Idhifa® 
R/R IDH2 mut AML as
monotherapy (FDA) 
Oral Phase 1/2 trial:
OR in 40.3% of patients, OS 9.3 months 
Check IDH2 mutational status at time of R/R disease,
IDH differentiation syndrome, indirect hyperbilirubinemia 
Ivosidenib
Tibsovo® 
Newly diagnosed or R/R IDH1 mut AML as monotherapy(FDA) Oral Phase 1b:
monotherapy CR in 22% and OR in 42% of patients 
Check IDH1 mutational status at time of diagnosis and R/R disease,
IDH differentiation syndrome, indirect hyperbilirubinemia 
Gilteritinib Xospata®
 
R/R FLT3 mut AML as monotherapy (FDA, EMA) Oral Phase 3 (ADMIRAL) trial:
gilteritinib vs salvage chemotherapy:
CR/CRi 34% (gilteritinib) vs 15.4% (salvage therapy); OS 9.3 (gilteritinib) vs 5.6 months (salvage therapy) 
Check FLT3 mutational status at time of R/R disease 
DrugIndicationRoute of administrationSignificant findings in clinical trialsIssues needing special attention
Midostaurin
Rydapt® 
Newly diagnosed FLT3 mut AML in combination with intensive therapy (FDA, EMA) Oral Phase 3 trial (RATIFY):
intensive chemotherapy + midostaurin vs placebo:
4-year OS: 51.4% midostaurin vs 44.3% placebo 
Careful administration of comedications with strong CYP3A4 inhibitory activity 
CPX-351
Vyxeos® 
Newly diagnosed tAML, AML-MRC (FDA, EMA) IV Phase 3 trial:
median OS 9.6 (CPX-351) vs 6.0 months (standard chemotherapy) 
Side effects similar to standard chemotherapy but less alopecia 
Gemtuzumab ozogamicin
Mylotarg® 
Newly diagnosed CD33+ AML (FDA, EMA) in combination with intensive therapy, R/R CD33+ AML in combination with intensive therapy (FDA) IV Phase 3 trial (ALFA-0701):
intensive chemotherapy +/− GO:
2-year OS: 53.2% GO vs 41.9% standard 
Hepatotoxicity (including veno-occlusive disease), infusion-related reactions, infection 
Venetoclax
Venclexta® 
Newly diagnosed AML in patients ≥75 years or with comorbidities precluding intensive therapy; in combination with LDAC or HMA (FDA) Oral VIALE-A trial:
VEN-AZA vs placebo:
median OS 14.7 (venetoclax) vs 9.6 months (placebo)
VIALE-C trial:
LDAC-VEN vs placebo:
median OS 8.4 (venetoclax)
vs 4.1 months (placebo) 
Hematological toxicity (follow recommended dose adjustments), neutropenic fever, dose adjustments if comedications with strong CYP3A4 inhibitory activity, tumor lysis syndrome (but much rarer than in CLL) 
Glasdegib
Daurismo® 
Newly diagnosed AML in patients ≥75 years or with comorbidities precluding intensive therapy; in combination with LDAC (FDA, EMA) Oral Phase 2 BRIGHT AML 1003 trial:
LDAC +/− glasdegib:
median OS was 8.8 (LDAC-glasdegib) vs 4.9 months (LDAC alone) 
Musculoskeletal pain 
CC-486
Onureg® 
Maintenance therapy AML patients in CR/CRi after intensive induction who are unable to complete intensive curative therapy Oral Phase 3 QUAZAR AML-001:
CC-486 vs placebo:
median OS 24.7 (CC-486) vs 14.8 months (placebo) 
GI toxicity, neutropenia 
Enasidenib
Idhifa® 
R/R IDH2 mut AML as
monotherapy (FDA) 
Oral Phase 1/2 trial:
OR in 40.3% of patients, OS 9.3 months 
Check IDH2 mutational status at time of R/R disease,
IDH differentiation syndrome, indirect hyperbilirubinemia 
Ivosidenib
Tibsovo® 
Newly diagnosed or R/R IDH1 mut AML as monotherapy(FDA) Oral Phase 1b:
monotherapy CR in 22% and OR in 42% of patients 
Check IDH1 mutational status at time of diagnosis and R/R disease,
IDH differentiation syndrome, indirect hyperbilirubinemia 
Gilteritinib Xospata®
 
R/R FLT3 mut AML as monotherapy (FDA, EMA) Oral Phase 3 (ADMIRAL) trial:
gilteritinib vs salvage chemotherapy:
CR/CRi 34% (gilteritinib) vs 15.4% (salvage therapy); OS 9.3 (gilteritinib) vs 5.6 months (salvage therapy) 
Check FLT3 mutational status at time of R/R disease 

CLL, chronic lymphocytic leukemia; CRi, CR with incomplete hematologic recovery; IV, intravenous; mut, mutated; OR, overall response.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal